Chipping Away at the Affordable Care Act: Payments to Insurers Suspended

One of the campaign promises Donald Trump appears to care about living up to is undermining all things Obama, not the least of which is the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The Trump administration’s latest bit of chipping away at the Affordable Care Act has been to suspend billions of dollars of “risk adjustment” payments to insurers who offer plans through the health exchanges set up as a result of the Affordable Care Act.

“Risk adjustment” payments pool risk for insurance companies, stabilize markets, and eliminate the incentive for insurers to restrict coverage only to healthier individuals and those without pre-existing conditions. The Affordable Care Act prohibits insurers from rejecting either type of potential member. Risk adjustment funds use money collected from insurers with healthier participants (and lower costs) to help supplement costs for insurers who take on the higher costs of enrolling sicker members.

The Trump administration cites a New Mexico district court ruling that disputes the current government formula for calculating the payments, and calls for their temporary suspension. A Massachusetts district court, however, upheld the current formula. Though the two rulings are in direct opposition to each other, the Trump administration has decided that it must abide by the New Mexico ruling – the one that would be most likely to lead to one more unraveling of the Affordable Care Act.

This is another step in making the marketplace “as inhospitable as possible,” according to Rodney Whitlock, Vice President of Health Policy at ML Strategies.

“The executive order the president signed, not long after he got to the White House after the [Inaugural] Parade was effectively, ‘We’re declaring war on the Affordable Care Act,'” says Whitlock.

Each year, fewer insurers participate in the health exchanges. Without the $10.4 billion in adjustment payments, or even with a delay in the payments, it’s likely that next year will see even fewer participating insurers and plans. Those who do participate are likely to significantly increase premiums for 2019. The result will be that even fewer small business owners and individuals – especially those who are very ill – will have access to affordable health care coverage.

With an administration that plainly cares more about abolishing Obama-era policy than it does about providing actual solutions for Americans, we’ll continue to lose not only our access to affordable health care, but we’ll also lose many of the regulations, such as environmental and food safety regulations, that were put in place to keep us healthy.

The issue of affordable and accessible healthcare (and the lack of it) has become like a can of worms that is not likely to disappear from the forefront. Many Americans who are insured through an employer, and/or who are perfectly healthy, are currently unable to see how this issue impacts their lives.

When more Americans, however, do feel the impact, whether from developing a serious and expensive illness, trying to obtain insurance with a pre-existing condition, or having a sick loved one without access to affordable healthcare, I predict that they will be wide open to the idea of a single payer or universal healthcare system – much to the dismay of the party who were its unwitting catalysts by dismantling the Affordable Care Act simply for the sake of doing so.

Trump Suspends Obamacare Risk Payments | Wochit News [2018-07-09]

Some payments halted for Obamacare program | Newsy | [2018-07-08]

Scott Pruitt Resigns from “Transformative Work”

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt resigned on July 5, 2018, keeping Team Trump in the lead for the number of White House staff departures. Though Pruitt is resigning amid numerous scandals in which he figures, some who know Pruitt hold him up as a “man of God.” Scott Pruitt, a Southern Baptist evangelical Christian, himself claims to believe that God put him in the position to serve Donald Trump. His resignation letter, full of references to “blessing” Trump, says as much. Below is a portion of the letter.

“My desire in service to you has always been to bless you as you make important decisions for the. American people. I believe you are serving as president today because of God’s providence. I believe the same providence brought me into your service. I pray as I have served you that I have blessed you and enabled you to effectively lead the American people.”

Scott Pruitt’s career has focused largely on faith-based issues. As a young attorney, he worked for the Rutherford Institute, a non-profit conservative organization. His first legal case was a lawsuit against the Oklahoma Department of Human Services for alleged infringement on the religious freedoms of his client.

Citing the “transformative work” taking place under Trump’s leadership, and with himself as head of the EPA, Scott Pruitt went on to say, “However, the unrelenting attacks on me personally, my family, are unprecedented and have taken a sizable toll on all of us.”

It has been a theme of late, especially during the advent of the Trump administration, for evangelicals to say that they are misunderstood, discriminated against for their beliefs, and even persecuted. No doubt, in the days to come, there will be a faction of evangelicals who rush to Pruitt’s defense, citing “persecution.”

Sometimes, allegations of “attacks” on one’s beliefs, or of the denial of religious freedom, are warranted. And yet, when one is associated with as much corruption as is Scott Pruitt, can anyone really say that the pressure on him to resign, and the subsequent widespread relief at his doing so, is “religious persecution”?

Scott Pruitt is the subject of over a dozen ethics investigations, which will continue despite his stepping down. Below are just a few examples of recent allegations against Scott Pruitt:

  • Pruitt used taxpayer money for personal items, including using $3,230 to purchase personalized journals and pens at $130 each from a luxury jewelry store.
  • Pruitt accepted gifts and favors from, and hobnobbed with, people in industries he was supposed to regulate, including the coal industry, the National Mining Association, and the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association.
  • An EPA whistleblower reported that Scott Pruitt and some of his staff kept a secret calendar for meetings that were possibly controversial, such as those with industry officials. This violates federal laws against hiding or falsifying public records.

It would be interesting to know what goes on in the mind of anyone who considers himself to be a “servant of God,” yet knowingly commits not one or two, but an ongoing series of plainly unethical acts. What does Scott Pruitt tell himself, and how does he reconcile “godly servanthood” with his corruptness?

Key Trump ally Scott Pruitt forced to resign | Al Jazeera English [2018-07-06]

Scott Pruitt resigns from the White House amid negative allegations: report | Fox Business [2018-07-05]