Editorial: Trump Hopes Reducing COVID-19 Testing Will Just Make It Go Away

On Thursday, the U.S. set another record for new COVID-19 cases— more than we’ve seen since early April. Donald Trump says the solution is obvious: Reduce testing. It appears to make perfect sense to many Trump stalwarts, too, that the way to slow the increase in the number of cases is not by wearing masks or by social distancing, but by simply eliminating testing. The Trump administration now plans to end federal funding for a number of COVID-19 testing sites in several states, despite public health experts’ warning that more testing, not less, is what will help contain the virus.

“Cases are going up in the U.S.,” Trump tweeted this week, “because we are testing far more than any other country, and ever expanding. With smaller testing we would show fewer cases!”

“Here’s the bad part,” said Trump at his rally in Tulsa, after boasting (falsely) that the U.S. was doing a bang-up job with coronavirus testing. “When you test the, when you do testing to that extent, you’re going to find more people, you’re going to find more cases. So I said to my people, slow the testing down please!”

The Tulsa crowd nodded and cheered at this. It was unclear why they were cheering for fewer tests, except that perhaps they saw brilliance in Trump’s logic that fewer tests mean fewer cases. Trump’s base is behind him all the way, as they always are, even when it endangers them.

Almost Immediately after Trump made those remarks, White House officials began claiming that he wasn’t serious.

Peter Navarro told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “Come on, now, Jake. You know that was tongue-in-cheek. Come on, now…It was a light moment.”

More than 122,000 Americans have now died from COVID-19. Nothing about the coronavirus warrants a light moment.

As they try to walk back Trump’s remark, it’s clear that even those who are close to Donald Trump are either in disbelief at what Trump said, or they are embarrassed by it.

In response to a reporter’s question about what Trump meant when he said he told his people to slow the testing down, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said, “He was kidding… The President was trying to expose — what the media oftentimes does is they ignore the fact that the United States has more cases because we have more testing.  We are leading the world in testing, and he was pointing that out that it’s a fact that the media readily ignores.”

She confirms what we’ve suspected all along: that one of the requirements for being a successful White House press secretary is the ability to gaslight without blinking an eye.

Trump later publicly stood by his comment, though. When asked if he had just been kidding, he said, “I don’t kid.”

McEnany later tried to clean up after Trump yet again by saying that Trump was also being sarcastic when he said, “I don’t kid.”

But it turns out that he wasn’t kidding.

Texas led the way in the hurry to re-open businesses and return to “normal.” Now, however, Texas is currently one of the leading states in the number of new cases per day. Though some people have waited for hours in line to get a test, federal funding for seven Texas testing sites will end on June 30. Several sites in Illinois, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Colorado will lose federal funding then, as well.

Twenty-seven states are now seeing sharp increases in the number of COVID-19 cases, deaths, and hospitalizations. Governors of many of those states, supporters of Trump, ignored the guidelines for when it was safe to begin reopening their states’ businesses, and some are still refusing to enforce mask-wearing in public. Some, until recently, have even boldly denied that their states were seeing surges in the numbers of cases, despite data showing that the opposite was true.

But Donald Trump maintains that the number of COVID-19 cases is surging because we’re doing more testing. It doesn’t matter whether he really believes this; what’s important is that his supporters continue to push that narrative and that his base sees it as logical. To his childlike way of thinking, all he has to do is reduce testing to reduce the number of reported cases, and his ratings will soar.

Public health and infectious disease experts have clearly laid out that testing, contract tracing, isolating cases, wearing masks and practicing social distancing while doing the testing and contact tracing are the ways to effectively manage and reduce the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. That process is how other countries have succeeded at reducing the spread.

The U.S., however, is led by a man whose inability to understand cause and effect, and whose lack of capacity for complex thinking are combined with a dearth of empathy. Donald Trump is only able to see through the lens of his re-election prospects; COVID-19 is not about human lives for him, it’s about numbers that will make him look good or bad.

Donald Trump still appears to believe that, as he said earlier this year, COVID-19 will just fade away, “Like a miracle.” But since it’s not fading away quickly enough for him, Trump is hoping that if he can at least prevent us from seeing it, it will be like it’s not there.

Public Health experts warn that COVID-19 is indeed still here, and will be with us for a long time. Donald Trump’s presidency, however, does not need to stay with us for much longer. On Election Day, for our survival as Americans, we need to make the Trump presidency go away, “Like a miracle.”

Trump on COVID testing | The Oklahoman [2020-06-20]

Pres. Donald Trump: Coronavirus ‘testing is a double-edged sword’ and driving up U.S. case numbers | | CNBC [2020-06-23]

Editorial: Could Supreme Court LGBT Ruling Impact Christian Right Voting?

Donald Trump, darling of the Christian Right, was elected in large part because he promised them that every day would be Christmas for their political and religious agendas. In return, the Christian Right has been willing to overlook, excuse, and rationalize virtually all of who Donald Trump is, as they have kept their eyes on that prize. But this week, evangelicals had a disappointing and ironic surprise when two of “their” appointed judges sided with the four liberal judges in a 6-3 ruling to protect LGBTQ employees from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender identity

During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump promised to advance the Christian Right platforms opposing abortion, same-sex marriage, and LGBTQ rights and protections. And whether Trump actually said as much, he had them convinced that he would “make America great again” largely by making America an evangelical Christian theocracy. He promised the fulfillment of their wishes in large part by his vow to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death with a conservative justice who would protect their values.

Eighty-one percent of white evangelicals voted for Trump in 2016. In the election exit poll, 21 percent of all voters considered Supreme Court appointments to be the most important factor in how they voted. Of those, 56 percent voted for Trump. They wanted conservative judges whom they could count on to make judgments that protected their values, and they put their trust in Trump and the Republicans to appoint the right judges. Trump kept his promise to appoint a Supreme Court justice who they felt had their backs when he appointed Neil M. Gorsuch to replace Scalia.

On Monday, however, Justice Gorsuch, along with Chief Justice John Roberts, sided with the liberal justices in their ruling that the 1964 Civil Rights Act protects gay, lesbian, and transgender employees from discrimination based on sex. It was Justice Gorsuch, in fact, who wrote the majority opinion.

“Today,” Gorsuch said, “we must decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender. The answer is clear.”

The ruling is a victory for the LGBTQ community. Some (though not the religious right) would see it as a hopeful sign on another front, as well: It was a loss for the Trump administration, who had sided with the employers in three cases involving members of the LGBTQ community who had lost their jobs. Consequently, no longer can Trump and the religious right take for granted that all conservative SCOTUS justices are in their pocket and will automatically take the side of the religious right, just because it is the side of the religious right.

As Washington Post columnist Henry Olsen writes, “Now that Gorsuch has proved himself untrustworthy in their eyes, they would be right to question whether Republican assurances meant anything at all.”

The Christian Right’s previous defenses of Trump, even when they have found him otherwise repugnant, have always been based on the fact that his various legislative actions favored them, and more importantly, he got them their judges. Now, however, they’ve discovered that even some conservative judges may disappoint them by basing decisions on legal merits rather than on making Trump supporters happy. What will this mean in the 2020 election for those conservatives and swing voters who voted for Trump on the basis of SCOTUS picks Christian Right-slanted legislation?

Why Supreme Court’s LGBTQ employment discrimination ruling marks a ‘milestone’ | PBS NewsHour  [2020-06-15]

Why evangelical Christians still support President Trump despite controversies | CBS News  [2018-03-28]