Donald Trump’s State of the Union: “A Manifesto of Mistruths”

Since Donald Trump took office, more often than not, each week has been drama-filled. This week, though, has been particularly so. The week started with the disastrous Iowa Democratic Caucus, followed by the President’s contentious State of the Union address, and then an acquittal for President Trump. Two Trump “victory lap speeches” rounded out the week.

Iowa Democratic Caucus Debacle

On Monday evening, Iowans opened presidential primary season by participating in caucuses and satellite caucuses around the world. They began the evening optimistic about a new app that they believed would make the task of reporting the thousands of hand-counted votes for candidates.

Americans waited for the counts to be totaled, but as the night wore on, it became clear that the reporting app had failed. No one would know for sure which candidate had won until the votes could all be re-tallied.

On Tuesday, 62 percent of votes had been counted, showing Pete Buttigieg in the lead, with Bernie Sanders in a close second. As of Friday morning, Americans continue to await an accurate count. Buttigieg and Sanders remain in a virtual tie, but the DNC is calling for a recanvass.

Trump’s Divisive State of the Union

As the country continued on Tuesday to wait for the results of the Iowa Democratic caucus, President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address. Full of boasting, half-truths, and lies, Trump’s speech, themed, “The Great American Comeback,” was merely a campaign speech that sowed new divisiveness and firmly reinforced existing divisiveness.

Using language clearly meant to stir his base, Trump appealed to their fears, promoting the ideas that “illegal aliens” (the term Trump insists on using) are dangerous and deadly; that sanctuary cities harbor immigrant criminals; and that the Democrats want to take away everyone’s guns and everyone’s health care.

“In sanctuary cities, local officials order police to release dangerous criminal aliens to prey upon the public, instead of handing them over to ICE to be safely removed,” Trump said.

He appealed to their fixation on the economy by taking credit for what he called a “Blue Collar Boom,” when in reality, it was during the Obama administration that the economy began making a comeback from the Great Recession. The increase in blue collar wages has come largely from individual states’ raising of state minimum wages, not from Trump’s policies. What’s more, the manufacturing sector is in recession.

Trump also plugged his Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, boasting that it had given Americans more money in their paychecks. In reality, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), Trump’s tax bill has not caused most Americans to take home more of their pay, and experts say that they will take home even less pay by 2024. What’s more, it has not caused the promised economic boost; the gross domestic product has only grown at 2.9 percent since the bill was passed.

Perhaps the biggest and most blatant lie of the evening was this: “We Will Always Protect Patients With Preexisting Conditions.” In truth, the Trump Administration has put forth a lawsuit that is working its way through the courts, aimed at eliminating the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), which prohibits insurance companies from denying or charging higher premiums for Americans with preexisting conditions. Neither Trump, nor GOP lawmakers, has presented a viable replacement health care policy.

Though Republicans in the chamber are aware of this lawsuit and that it seeks to undo healthcare for millions of Americans, they all stood up and cheered when Trump talked of it. One has to wonder: are they terribly naive, or are they all in on the duplicity?

In fact, Trump’s cabinet, as well as the Republican members of Congress, stood and cheered each time Trump finished a sentence — eerily reminiscent of a World War II film clip of the German army saluting their Fuhrer.

Other untruths and misrepresentations filled Trump’s State of the Union address, including repeated references to “ cleaning up the mess of the previous administration.”

To that, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi later responded, “He did not inherit a mess, he inherited the momentum of a growing economy.”

“Nancy the Ripper”

Long after Trump’s exact words are forgotten, though, Americans will still remember the flourish with which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, after the address, tore in half the sheets of paper containing the words of Trump’s address, calling it “A manifesto of mistruths.”

“Considering some of the other exuberances within me,” said Pelosi, “It was the courteous thing to do… He shredded the State of the Union, I shredded his state of his mind address.”

Though many Americans were appalled at Pelosi’s action, others responded favorably.

Twitter user @LOLGOP tweeted on Wednesday, “If you’re offended by a woman ripping up a speech, wait until later today when every Republican in the Senate rips up the entire Constitution in the name of helping the most corrupt president in American history steal an election.”

Senate Acquits Trump; Romney Votes with Dems

And later that day, Wednesday, January 5, as most people expected, the U.S. Senate acquitted President Donald J. Trump of the impeachment charges the U.S. House of Representatives had brought against him. All Democrats voted to remove Trump from office. All Republicans but one, Mitt Romney (R-Utah), voted to acquit on both articles. Romney voted “guilty” on the the first article, “abuse of power.”

No one was surprised, least of all Romney, when Trump immediately took to Twitter to attack him. In just a few hours after the Senate vote, Trump tweeted a video calling Romney “the face of the resistance,” and a “Democrat secret asset” who had tried to “infiltrate Trump’s administration as Secretary of State.”

Trump Continues to Wax Divisive During National Prayer Breakfast

Trump continued his vitriolic and often unhinged emoting during Thursdays’ National Prayer Breakfast, and again in his unapologetic post-acquittal speech at noon on Thursday. Supporters yet again laughed and cheered as Trump demonized and made examples of Pelosi and Romney, the two most recent people who had crossed him.

Donald Trump will continue to illustrate and underline the reasons why Congress voted to impeach him: abuse of power (which continues to become more blatant) and obstruction of Congress (which he has boasted about).

Though Senate Democrats were not successful in removing Trump from office, he remains, as Nancy Pelosi reminds us, “impeached forever.” Voters will have their own chance to rip up the figurative manifesto of mistruths in just 269 days.

Donald Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address | Guardian News
[2020-02-05]

Iowa Democratic Party Releases Partial Caucus Results With Buttigieg Leading | NBC News [2020-02-04]

Impeachment Trial Begins, Lev Parnas Surfaces with New Damning Evidence

With 290 days until the 2020 U.S. presidential election, the impeachment of President Donald Trump dominates the news. On Wednesday, January 15, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the two articles of impeachment against Trump, who is charged with abuse of presidential power, and obstruction of Congress.

Prior to signing the articles, Pelosi announced the names of the seven impeachment managers she has chosen to present the case for impeachment to the Senate. They are House Representatives Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Val Demings (D-Fla.), Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Jason Crow (D-Colo.), and Sylvia Garcia (D-Texas). After the signing of the articles, Pelosi and the impeachment managers walked across the Capitol to the Senate chamber to deliver the articles, per protocol.

The articles charge that Trump abused his power by withholding already-approved military aid to Ukraine, as well as the promise of a White House meeting with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskiy in order to pressure Zelenskiy to announce an investigation of Democratic primary candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who held a high-paying job as consultant to Burisma, Ukraine’s largest energy provider. The articles further charge that Trump obstructed Congress by blocking key evidence and testimony.

The Senate formally accepted the articles on Thursday. On Thursday afternoon, Chief Justice John Roberts, who will preside over the trial in the Senate, administered the jurors’ oath to all 100 senators, to swear to deliver “impartial justice.” It should be noted, however, that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has already openly promised not to be impartial.

“This is an example of all of the president’s henchmen,” Pelosi reflected, “and I hope that the senators do not become part of the president’s henchmen.”

The actual trial is expected to begin on Tuesday, January 21.

Meanwhile, The Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan agency that reports to Congress, has determined this week that Trump’s hold on the military aid to Ukraine was a violation of federal law governing how the White House may disburse funds approved by Congress.

“Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the decision states. “OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act.”

Though impeachment does not require violation of a federal law, this development will no doubt be significant as the impeachment trial plays out. Republicans are already trying to point out that the GAO is pointing the finger at the OMB (Office of Management and Budget), not at the president. It was the president, however, who ordered that the military funds be put on hold.

And as impeachment trial preparations were brewing this week, additional evidence was unearthed, appearing to confirm the nature of Trump’s motivation in his plan to have the Bidens investigated.

Trump maintains that he was simply motivated by his concern about corruption in Ukraine for the sake of “the American people.” Strong evidence indicates, however, that Trump was motivated purely by personal gain — uncovering dirt on the Bidens, or, at the very least, stirring up controversy and casting doubt on Joe Biden’s integrity as he runs for president.

Lev Parnas, a former associate of Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has provided documents and granted interviews containing information that indicate that Donald Trump was directly involved in the Ukraine pressure campaign, and that his motivation was for personal gain, not for the good of the U.S. Further, Trump’s intent was to investigate the Bidens, not to investigate general corruption in Ukraine.

James Hohmann of the Washington Post writes, “Evidence of the president’s hands-on role bolsters the Democratic case that Trump himself abused his power, not outside advisers who were pursuing personal interests in the president’s name.”

Included in Parnas’ documents was a message thread from March 2019 between Parnas and Robert Hyde, a current Republican candidate for Congress in Connecticut. The subject of the messages was former ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, who was recalled from her post by the Trump administration in May 2019. In his interviews with the media this week, Lev Parnas confirmed that Yovanovitch was seen as an obstacle to Trump’s plan for investigation of the Bidens.
The messages suggest Hyde and others may have been following the diplomat in Kiev. “They are moving her tomorrow,” Hyde wrote to Parnas. “The guys over there asked me what I would like to do and what is in it for them.”

He then noted that Yovanovitch turned off her phone and computer.

“They are willing to help if we/you would like a price,” Hyde said. “Guess you can do anything in the Ukraine with money … what I was told.”

“Lol,” Parnas responded, indicating “laugh out loud.”.

Several days later, Hyde wrote: “It’s confirmed we have a person inside.”

Though the U.S. State Department continues to remain silent about the exchanges and the possibility of unauthorized surveillance of Yovanovitch by associates of Trump, Ukraine has announced that it will launch an investigation.

“Ukraine’s position is not to interfere in the domestic affairs of the United States of America,” Ukraine’s Interior Ministry stated. “Ukraine cannot ignore such illegal activities on the territory of its own state.”

Parnas has since said that he didn’t take the exchange seriously. Hyde, too, dismissed it as a joke.

Though some of Parnas’ new information still needs to be corroborated, other portions of it support the existing evidence against Trump and his associates. It’s yet to be determined whether, or if, this new evidence will be used in the Senate impeachment trial.

On the other side of the world, Russia’s entire cabinet resigned on Wednesday. Russian president Vladimir Putin had, earlier on Wednesday, announced that he would be pushing through reforms to the constitution. The changes would redistribute power so that parliament and the prime minister would have more power, but Putin’s successor as president would be considerably weakened. Putin, whose term as president ends in 2024, could then take on a new role and continue to be a powerful figure in the Russian government. (Speaking of abuse of power…)

Putin simply thanked his former government and said that “not everything worked out.”

Given what our president has successfully been able to get away with, given his statement, “Then I have an Article 2 (of the U.S. Constitution), where I have the right to do whatever I want as president,” and given that our current GOP largely disregards the checks and balances system of our three-branch government, we can only hope that Election 2020 eliminates the possibility of something similar happening in the U.S.

Impeachment process moves ahead amid new revelations from Lev Parnas | CBS News [2020-01-16]

Trump reacts to photograph of him with Lev Parnas: “I take thousands of pictures” | Global News [2020-01-16]