Editorial: Putin Offered Bounties on American Troops; Trump Did Nothing

This weekend, the world learned that a Russian intelligence unit was offering Taliban militants bounties on coalition troops, including Americans, in Afghanistan. We also learned that the Trump administration knew about it as early as January of 2019. The White House is scrambling to create its narrative around why no one in the Trump administration considered this intel to be grave enough to warrant further action by America’s Commander-in-Chief.

After the story broke in the New York Times, Trump did not address the information immediately, but instead went golfing.

On Sunday, he took to Twitter in an effort to slither out from under any personal responsibility, claiming he hadn’t previously been briefed on the information.

“Nobody briefed or told me, @VP Pence, or Chief of Staff @MarkMeadows about the so-called attacks on our troops in Afghanistan by Russians, as reported through an ‘anonymous source’ by the Fake News @nytimes,” Trump tweeted on Sunday morning.

On Sunday evening, Trump tweeted, “Intel just reported to me that they did not find this info credible, and therefore did not report it to me or @VP. Possibly another fabricated Russia Hoax, maybe by the Fake News @nytimesbooks, wanting to make Republicans look bad!!!”

Trump didn’t ask why no one had briefed him. He didn’t express outrage that rewards had been offered for special attacks on American soldiers; he didn’t denounce Russian president Putin; he didn’t try to verify the information or proclaim that he wanted to get to the bottom of this piece of news that would be upsetting to the loved ones of soldiers stationed in Afghanistan; he didn’t show any concern for the safety of American troops.

As with his response to the coronavirus pandemic, Donald Trump is not concerned about the lives of Americans that have been lost or that may be currently in danger; he’s concerned with how the news makes him look. This, to him, is nothing more than another plot to make him look bad. And Trump looks very bad.

Most parents wouldn’t let their teenager use “I didn’t know about it, so don’t blame me,” as a valid excuse to avoid consequences; it’s never an acceptable device for a president of the United States. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) in a floor speech on the topic on Monday said that in this case, “ignorance isn’t exculpatory.”

“’No one told me’ is not an excuse for a commender in chief. It is in fact a confession of incompetence.”

On Monday, in response to questions about why, if it was true that the president hadn’t known about the bounty plot against American soldiers, no one had briefed him, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany responded that the intelligence hadn’t been verified, and so was not included in a presidential briefing.

“There is no consensus within the intelligence community on these allegations,” McEnany said, adding there were “dissenting opinions” on the intelligence assessment.

Typically, a president of the United States is immediately notified of any possible threat to US troops. If what Kayleigh McEnany said were true, it would mean that White House officials were mulling over this urgent piece of intelligence for months. They took no action.

Perhaps White House officials didn’t trust the president with the information. Some reports say that senior White House officials saw Trump as a danger to national security. Perhaps they feared that Trump would tell Putin, Putin would deny it, and Trump would double down on his pandering to Putin. Or perhaps they were afraid to brief Trump because of their experience with his unhinged responses to other situations that might cast him in an unfavorable light.

According to political columnist David Ignatius, who did further research that confirmed the claims in the New York Times’ story, “(The Pentagon was) pounding on the door of the White House NSC operation, urging that the White House address the intelligence surrounding Putin’s bounty plot. But, says Ignatius, “One of the things I’ve watched with this administration is a growing fear of telling the boss the truth. Because the boss will go nuts, and he’ll be angry at you, or he’ll fire you…We saw this again and again in his interventions in military issues. …The president goes ballistic if he gets news he doesn’t want to hear.”

On Monday, it was confirmed that the intel about the plot had been included in the president’s daily briefing, at least once. He may just not have bothered to read it. While Donald Trump was praising Putin and encouraging him to rejoin the G7, Putin was offering money to the Taliban to kill American soldiers.

This year alone, our president has ducked leadership as the coronavirus has become a pandemic. He can’t be bothered to sort out opportunistic “thugs” from peaceful demonstrators (or acknowledge the systemic racism they’re protesting). It’s simply too much to ask, then, that we should expect Trump to show up in any way for American soldiers or for our national security, though he does manage to show up for the world’s despots.

If Donald Trump just didn’t read the briefing about Putin’s bounty plot and was consequently unaware, he is incompetent. If senior officials avoided orally briefing him out of fear of his response, it demonstrates Trump’s instability, indicates the depth of dysfunction of this administration, and makes a frightening statement about the tenuous state of our nation’s security. If he knew, and did nothing, it means he made the conscious choice to allow the lives of U.S. service members to be at risk. None of these options indicates a president who is in any way fit for office.

Trump denies knowledge of Russia bounty plot  |  Reuters [2020-06-29]

Outrage grows over Russian bounties  |  ABC News [2020-06-28]

Editorial: Why Does Donald Trump Avoid the Word “Racism”?

As mostly peaceful demonstrations continue across the U.S., Donald Trump has not only avoided addressing the systemic racism in the U.S. that motivated the protests, he avoids even saying the word, “racism.” That is, except when he is defending himself against an accusation that he is a racist.

According to an ABC News poll, “74 percent of Americans view the death of George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer as a sign of an underlying racial injustice problem.”

In the past week, numerous leaders and public figures, both Democrat and Republican, have publicly condemned racism in the U.S.—the racism that led to the murder of George Floyd and other African Americans, by police.

Even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), a Trump apologist, acknowledged that many Americans see the recent killings of African Americans George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and Breonna Taylor as “the latest disturbing chapters in our long, unfinished American struggle to ensure that equal justice under law is not conditional on the color of one’s skin.”

Trump has been largely silent about racism, and has repeatedly conflated the peaceful protesters with others who have rioted and looted at the scenes of demonstrations. The effect is that his message of “law and order” and of violence against demonstrators seem more reasonable and even heroic, to his base.

“….These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!” Trump tweeted on May 29. (Twitter flagged the tweet with a warning, but did not remove it.)

The phrase, ‘When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” was first used in 1967 by then-Miami police Chief Walter Headley, and directed at young black men.

Despite Trump’s frequent tweets about the demonstrations, it took him two days to tweet about George Floyd’s death, though the disturbing video of the white police officer pinning Floyd down on the pavement with a knee to Floyd’s neck until Floyd died had been widely circulated.

“My heart goes out to George’s family and friends. Justice will be served!” Trump tweeted.

When Trump finally commented publicly (outside of Twitter) about Floyd’s death, his comments didn’t directly mention racism, but instead only acknowledged the pain of people who have “been through a lot.”

Trump also said, “The family of George is entitled to justice and the people of Minnesota are entitled to live in safety. Law and order will prevail.”

As with so many of Trump’s comments, they were vague enough and multi-purpose enough to satisfy his base in several ways. On one level, the base could use them to defend Trump against an accusation of racism. (“See, he is acknowledging that ‘they’ have been through a lot. He said George’s family deserves justice. That shows he’s not a racist.”) On another level, one could interpret them as showing strength (“He’s going to make sure those bad, looting protesters get what’s coming to them.”)

In the days that have followed, Trump has continued and even amplified his “law and order” rhetoric and signaling to his base regarding the demonstrations that are still taking place daily around the country. In his June 1 address about the demonstrations, Trump slipped in some remarks about defending 2nd Amendment rights:

“I am mobilizing all available federal resources — civilian and military — to stop the rioting and looting, to end the destruction and arson, and to protect the rights of law-abiding Americans, including your Second Amendment rights.”

Who among Trump’s base did not interpret Trump’s remarks as a call to arms–  an invitation to the right-wing militia folks to step in and “help” with crowd control during the demonstrations?

Many white people are uncomfortable talking about race and racism, even if they hate it. Many others pretend or imagine that it doesn’t really exist, or that it’s “overblown.” But the blatant, hate-filled racist injustice that stared us all in the face by way of a video of George Lloyd being murdered by a police officer should be enough get almost anyone upset and talking about it. What president (or any decent human being) would not have been moved to immediately address his citizens’ outrage and pain? Our president, Donald J. Trump.

Even so, why has Trump not even pretended to care or be concerned for the millions of people of color in the U.S. whose lives are fraught with the effects of racism? Why has he not even uttered the word “racism,” acknowledged that it’s a national problem, or condemned it?

It’s because Donald Trump knows that his base is not interested. And Donald Trump is only interested in pandering to his base, who serve as his narcissistic reflection. Donald Trump only condemns what he thinks his base will praise him for condemning. He is only outraged when he perceives that someone has insulted or disagreed with him. And he is only moved by what impacts him and his re-election prospects.

“The president is always cognizant of how certain phrases are going to be interpreted by his hardcore base,” says Mark Anthony Neal, chair of the Department of African & African American Studies at Duke University. “He’s never going to talk about systematic racism in that way because he knows that’s something his base is not interested in and doesn’t want to hear.”

Donald Trump’s base doesn’t like it when someone accuses them of racism. Even if they acknowledge that racism exists, they don’t like seeing it as a problem that they’re a part of. And even if they see it as a problem, they don’t think it’s really a very big problem. They see the people who are the victims of racism—the immigrants and migrants and people of color—as the problem. They see Donald Trump as the one to solve the problem.

Donald Trump knows all of that, and he knows that his base wants to hear that it’s ok for them to blame “those people” for what’s wrong in this country, and for all of their feelings. He knows, too, that that adding a second amendment dog whistle, even out of context, makes them prick up their ears for an opportunity to exercise them, as in opposing protesters (it doesn’t matter to them whether they represent Black Lives Matter or whether they’re opportunists looking to make some trouble. Donald Trump has muddied the difference for them). Trump knows that condemning racism might make his base begin to question whether he still has their backs.

Why has Donald Trump not publicly condemned racism? Why, indeed.

Pres. Trump asked how he plans to address systemic racism  |  ABC News
 [2020-06-05]

President Trump makes remarks about protests | News 19 WLTX
[2020-06-01]