Editorial: The 2020 Republican National Convention’s Assumptions about Trump Voters

To watch the 2020 Republican National Convention was an exercise in trying to determine whether each speaker was purposely gaslighting, or just grossly lacking in party self-awareness. One thing was clear, however: the foundation of the 2020 Republican National Convention was fear and falsehood, tailored specifically to assumptions about Trump’s base that the Republicans are banking on.

They assume the base doesn’t really understand what socialism is, that they’re terrified of it, and that they think it’s the same as communism.

The words “socialism” and “socialist” were frequently repeated throughout the convention, as nearly every speaker warned the audience that with Joe Biden, America would be cast into the darkness of socialism. “They” would take away god and guns, and use mind control to keep Americans in line.

Nikki Haley, the former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, warned that the Democrats’ “vision for America is socialism,” coupled with the desire to “tell Americans how to live and what to think.”

Don­ald Trump, Jr., cautioned the audience that “Joe Biden and the rad­i­cal Left are also now com­ing for our free­dom of speech and want to bul­ly us into sub­mis­sion.”

Kimberly Guilefoyle, partner of Donald Trump, Jr., gave the best reflection of the base’s confusion about socialism during her loud and frenzied speech: “Biden, Harris and the rest of the socialists will fundamentally change this nation. They want open borders, closed schools, dangerous amnesty, and will selfishly send your jobs back to China while they get rich. They will defund, dismantle and destroy America’s law enforcement. When you are in trouble and need police, don’t count on the Democrats.”

The GOP’s fear mongering about socialism that had been aimed at former candidate Bernie Sanders was turned on Joe Biden when Sanders dropped out of the presidential race. Biden, known for working successfully with lawmakers across the aisle, and a known moderate Democrat for at least four decades, is now cast by the GOP as “dangerous” to democracy. Republicans know that once they slap the label “socialist” on any lawmaker, much of their propaganda work is done.

They assume that people in the suburbs (all white, of course) are terrified that “others” will make their neighborhoods dangerous. (But “they’re not racist.”)

Targeting “suburban women,” the Trumpian message was based on the assumption that these women (and their families, too) are ruled by the fear that Black people, other people of color, and low-income people will move into their nice, quiet neighborhoods and create an environment of violence and crime. This is one of Trump’s favorite racist dog whistles to his base.

On the opening night of the RNC, the McCloskeys— that Saint Louis couple who were filmed standing in front of their mansion wielding firearms at Black Lives Matter demonstrators who had taken a detour through the McCloskeys’ upper-class neighborhood— had a prime speaking spot.

In an ominous tone, Patricia McCloskey warned that Democrats want to take away the suburbs. “They’re not satisfied with spreading the chaos and violence into our communities,” she said. “They want to abolish the suburbs altogether — by ending single-family home zoning. This forced rezoning would bring crime, lawlessness and low-quality apartments into now thriving suburban neighborhoods… No matter where you live, your family will not be safe in the radical Democrats’ America.”

The McCloskeys’ cautionary tale of terror in the suburbs brought to mind similar language around forced busing from earlier decades: If we bring in others, everything will not only be ruined, it will be dangerous and chaotic. (Could that be what they mean when they say “Make America Great Again”?)

Despite featuring a racist couple during the convention, RNC speakers denied that America has a problem with racism.

“It’s now fashionable to say that America is racist. That is a lie,” Nikki Haley said in her RNC speech Monday night. “America is not a racist country.”

Yet, as she spoke, America had just learned of yet another brutal shooting of an unarmed Black man by police in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Jacob Blake was shot in the back seven times in front of his children. Instead of expressing sorrow or outrage over the incident, or any of the recent similar incidents, speakers focused on the “lawlessness and chaos” of the resulting protests taking place in “Democrat-led cities across America,” blaming the “Marxist” Black Lives Matter demonstrators for the looting and violence.

They have created an alternative COVID-19 reality, and they assume that their base believes it (they do).

On each day of the RNC, nearly 1,000 people died of COVID-19 in the U.S. To date, nearly 180,000 Americans have died of the virus. No one who spoke at the RNC acknowledged the numbers, let alone that they were attached to human lives.

Yet Trump receive praise for his “heroic response” to the coronavirus pandemic. According to several speakers, Trump took fast and decisive action to contain the virus. Ventilators and supplies got to hospitals quickly, by the speakers’ accounts, and Trump shut down travel to and from China, saving “millions and millions of lives.” On the last night of the convention, Trump told the maskless, shoulder-to-shoulder crowd of 1500 on the White House lawn, that there will definitely be a vaccine “by the end of the year, or maybe even sooner,” come hell, high water, or lack of sufficient vetting.

They ignored Trump’s initial lack of response and subsequent downplaying of the pandemic. They turned the real situation of governors begging for ventilators and supplies into a success story featuring Donald Trump as a benevolent and capable leader through crisis. Grasping at one of the only positive truths they could tell about Trump’s response, they cited Trump’s partial  restrictions on travel to and from China (though shutting down travel to China was too little too late, since the virus had already arrived in New York via Europe).

In Trumpworld, the virus is a thing of the past, and it’s all due to Donald Trump’s heroic actions. White House aide Larry Kudlow portrayed Trump’s handling of the pandemic as a huge victory:

“Then came a once-in-100-year pandemic,” Kudlow said. “It was awful. Health and economic impacts were tragic, hardship and heartbreak were everywhere, but presidential leadership came swiftly and effectively with an extraordinary rescue for health and safety to successfully fight the COVID virus.” As if it were all long ago and by now, far away.

Trump Campaign Communications Director Tim Murtaugh said Trump was “out front and leading the nation in the fight against the coronavirus,” pointing to his restriction on travel into the U.S. from China and Europe and his efforts to produce PPE.

Today, the U.S. has nearly 22 percent of the world’s COVID-19 cases, though it only has 4 percent of the world’s population. Cases continue to climb in some parts of the country, though many in Trump’s base, following his example, treat the virus as if it were the common cold.

They assume, accurately, that their base are largely white evangelical fundamentalists.

Donald Trump and the RNC speech writers may or may not have studied the Bible itself very much, but they have studied the words and mentions that push the buttons of the evangelicals. Second only to the words “socialist” and “socialism” during the convention was a lexicon of evangelicalese words and phrases guaranteed to stir the hearts and evoke “amens” from many in the audience. A number of speakers peppered their speeches with “Jesus” and “Christ.”

They painted a vision of a godly America under Trump, with evangelical prayer in schools and evangelical laws against everything, well, non-evangelical. They warned that in Joe Biden’s America, people would no longer be allowed to attend church or worship (because… socialism). It should be noted that despite the fact the Joe Biden is known to have a deep religious faith, some evangelical fundamentalists don’t recognize Catholics as Christians.

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan put the icing on all of the GOP talking points when he said that the  “Democrats won’t let you go to church, but they’ll let you protest,” referring to the strict lockdowns by many Democratic governors (and some Republicans, too) aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

Keeping in mind that evangelical fundamentalists tend to be one-issue voters (abortion), they brought in Sister Deirdre Byrne to stress that Donald Trump is “the most pro-life President that this nation has ever had.”

“President Trump will stand up against Biden-Harris, who are the most anti-life presidential ticket ever, even supporting the horrors of late term abortion and infanticide,” said Byrne.

Shame on Sister Dede for promoting a falsehood. Joe Biden has not expressed support for late-term abortion, let alone infanticide. He does support codifying Roe v. Wade into law, however. Yes, Byrne is a Catholic nun, but it’s ok to use Catholics when they can further Trump’s anti-abortion message to single-issue voters.

They assume (again, accurately) that most of Trump’s base aren’t big on fact-checking.

They know that truth is irrelevant to Trump’s base. The narrative put forth during the Republican National Convention could only work in a world where there is no fact-checking. Trump rests in the knowledge that in Trumpworld, fact-checking is a demonstration of disloyalty to the president. Donald Trump and Fox News provide all the facts they need.

It’s ironic and a little sad to see that Trump’s base, who believes that Donald Trump alone can save them from the Democrats’ tyranny and despotism (which they tend to confuse with “socialism”) is, in reality, playing right into the hands of the one who really is plunging them directly into tyranny and despotism.

The McCloskeys speak at 2020 RNC | ABC News [2020-08-24]

WATCH: Kimberly Guilfoyle’s full speech at the Republican National Convention | 2020 RNC Night 1 | PBS NewsHour [2020-08-24]

Editorial: The Coronavirus Pandemic Didn’t Create the Holes in Our System

One could conjecture that as much as the coronavirus pandemic has hurt our economy, it is the ongoing failures of lawmakers to truly champion Americans in need, and the lack of existing systems to work for their benefit, that  have done at least as much damage over time.

This weekend, tens of millions of unemployed Americans stand to lose the emergency supplemental unemployment assistance that has helped them through joblessness during the coronavirus pandemic. The federal benefit supplement, part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), will expire on Saturday. Senate Republicans can’t agree on a new coronavirus legislative package to present to Democrats, and it’s uncertain how, or if, the bill will address an extension to the federal emergency jobless benefit supplement.

While the Republicans haggle over what to include in a new relief bill, millions of Americans fear losing their homes, no longer having health insurance, and figuring out which bills to pay and which they’ll have to let go for now.  Some are still waiting to begin receiving their first round of unemployment benefits, due to outdated and backlogged claims processing systems in various states.

Back in May, House Democrats passed an economic stimulus bill that would, among other things, extend the federal unemployment benefit supplement created in the CARES Act through the end of the year, as well as provide another round of one-time stimulus checks to Americans. That bill, however, has been sitting on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s desk.

GOP Senators hope to agree on their own bill to present to Democrats by Monday, July 27. It’s not certain whether the bill will include an extension of the emergency unemployment benefit, or whether that will be addressed separately.

The GOP bill is expected to include, among other items, funds for schools, some of which would be tied to reopening classrooms. It would also include a new round of stimulus payments to individuals. McConnell, however, is pressing for the stimulus payments to go only to Americans earning less than $40,000 a year, which would leave many Americans falling through the cracks.

President Trump had pushed for including a payroll tax cut, possibly instead of extending federal unemployment benefits. Though he had threatened not to sign a bill without a tax cut, Republicans have resisted, since it would only help those who still receive paychecks. Additionally, it would drain the Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

Reflecting the perspective of someone who has apparently never experienced financial hardship, conservative economist Stephen Moore, who advised Trump during his 2016 campaign, disagreed. “We’ve gone in less than 10 days from Trump saying that he won’t sign a bill without a payroll tax cut to the bill they’re drafting not having a payroll tax cut,” he said. “There is no benefit from dumping money from helicopters into people’s laps.”

If the supplemental benefit is not extended, unemployed Americans will revert back to receiving only their state unemployment benefits, which average $370 per week. One could argue that they are the people who would benefit from some money dumped into their laps.

Many Republicans have agreed on temporarily extending the emergency unemployment benefit, but reducing it from the original $600 per week to $200 per week.

But, says Ernie Tedeschi, who was a Treasury Department economist during the Obama administration, “U.S. Gross Domestic Product would be 1.33 percentage points smaller at the end of the year than if the benefit were extended at $600 per week for the rest of the year.” He added that the resulting reduction in spending would lead to more than 1 million fewer jobs.

Other Republicans oppose extending the unemployment supplement at all because they worry that it will be a disincentive for jobless Americans to return to work. A “back-to-work” incentive payment has also been suggested instead of an extended jobless benefit supplement.

“It’s not a difficult concept. You don’t get paid more to stay home than you do when you have a job,” said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Perhaps they’re thinking that Americans should just heed Ivanka Trump’s tone-deaf advice and “find something new,” even in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic.

As Senate Republicans dicker over how little assistance they can get away with giving Americans, and what stipulations they can put on the assistance, it’s apparent that what concerns many Republican lawmakers most is the fear that some American somewhere might get a dollar he or she isn’t entitled to. They fret over the possibility that someone might not be jumping through enough hoops for the assistance they receive.

But let’s suppose that for some Americans, the lack of motivation to seek work is due to the fact that their unemployment benefit is greater than what they’d earned at their jobs. When someone can earn more from a jobless benefit than they can when they work full-time (or more), the problem is not with the employee, it’s with the lack of a livable minimum wage.

Republican lawmakers continue to collect their salaries and enjoy their excellent health insurance as they fail to act on behalf of American workers. Their squeamishness for what they see as “handouts,” and the requirements they continually want to set up to ensure that no one gets “too much” have perpetuated an inept and inadequate social welfare system, leaving many hardworking Americans without a safety net– especially if they were living paycheck to paycheck during better economic times.

When millions of Americans have no safety net, or fall through the holes of a weak safety net, it reverberates throughout the U.S. economy. The coronavirus pandemic has only magnified this. It may have exacerbated our economic situation, but more than that, it has highlighted the glaring ways in which our system has failed, and continues to fail, many Americans.

White House and Republican senators reach tentative deal on new coronavirus stimulus package | CBS News [2020-07-23]

Coronavirus stimulus: Mnuchin says there is a ‘fundamental’ agreement between White House and GOP | Yahoo Finance [2020-07-23]