Scott Pruitt’s Proposed Obama-era Rollbacks: Is Time on Our Side?

Under Scott Pruitt, the current head of the Environmental Protection Agency, a large number of Obama-era EPA regulations are under attack. Donald Trump promised to destroy Obama’s environmental protection legacy, simply because it was Obama’s legacy. Scott Pruitt intends to help Trump carry out his promise.

Currently, Scott Pruitt’s EPA has targeted more than 60 environmental regulations from the Obama era for demolition, delay, or suspension. As it does in other areas, such as education, health care, and gun safety policy, the Trump administration demonstrates that it values reversing anything done by the previous administration, as well as saying “no” to anything from “the left,” over the safety and health of its constituents.

Fortunately for Americans, undoing federal regulations is more complicated than simply ordering Scott Pruitt to make it so. The courts don’t look favorably on rolling back regulations simply because one doesn’t like the person who passed them. At least some of Scott Pruitt’s rollbacks have been challenged by the legal system; six have been reversed in court.

In his rush to overturn regulations, Scott Pruitt has often failed to follow many legal protocols, and has neglected to provide adequate supporting materials such as legal and scientific data to justify his proposals. This has resulted in sloppy and poorly crafted legal cases, which aren’t likely to hold up in court. An example is the attempted repeal of the Obama-era emissions law that aimed to reduce auto tailpipe emissions of greenhouse gases.

“If (it) gets challenged in court, I just don’t see how they provide anything that gives a technical justification to undo the rule,” said James McCargar, a former EPA senior policy analyst.

Although we should be vigilant, it is wise to remember that the laws passed during the Obama administration sometimes required years of careful scientific research and legal due diligence in order to withstand thorough examination in the courts. Similarly, they would take time to dismantle.

“You have to do the hard work of developing a rule that can withstand judicial scrutiny, even though it isn’t sexy,” says David Hayes, director of the State Energy & Environmental Impact Center at NYU School of Law.  “Pruitt hasn’t been willing to do that, and that’s why he isn’t really having much of an impact.”

No matter how much Scott Pruitt wishes he could take down Obama’s environmental legacy with the swipe of a pen or the tap of a gavel, it also takes time and due diligence to undo laws. Or, in Scott Pruitt’s case, many of his proposed repeals won’t even make it to the “pending” phase before the courts strike them down. Perhaps we can dare to hope that the haphazardness of Scott Pruitt’s attempts will continue to keep our current environmental regulations in place, at least until a new administration.

EPA to Roll Back Obama-era Emissions, Fuel Economy Standards | CBS This Morning [2018-04-03]

Trump’s EPA to Roll Back Obama-era Fuel Economy Standards  | Fox News [2018-04-03]

David Shulkin, This Week’s White House Departure

Veterans Affairs Secretary Dr. David Shulkin’s head is the most recent one to roll at the Trump White House. Dr. Shulkin was fired on March 28. President Trump cited his reason for dismissing David Shulkin as the fact that Shulkin wasn’t in alignment with the White House agenda to privatize U.S. veterans’ health care.

During a speech in Ohio, Donald Trump said of David Shulkin’s firing,“We made changes because we want them (veterans) taken care of, we want them to have choice so that they can run to a private doctor and take care of it, and it’s going to get done…It’s going to get done. We’ll always protect the people that have protected us. We have to.”

In a New York Times op-ed he wrote shortly after being ousted, David Shulkin wrote, ““They saw me as an obstacle to privatization who had to be removed…As I prepare to leave government, I am struck by a recurring thought: It should not be this hard to serve your country.”

David Shulkin said that he has argued against privatization. The private sector, he maintains, is “ill-prepared” to address the numerous and unique health care needs of veterans. The Veterans Administration has a body of research and a greater understanding of the issues that veterans face, according to Shulkin.

“…I am convinced that privatization is a political issue aimed at rewarding select people and companies with profits, even if it undermines care for veterans.”

David Shulkin had earlier been the subject of a report by the VA Inspector General, accusing him of improperly accepting tickets to Wimbledon, and of using his government staff to help him arrange a European sightseeing tour. Shulkin repaid the Veterans Administration for the Wimbledon tickets. In his op-ed, David Shulkin wrote,

“I am a physician, not a politician. I came to government with an understanding that Washington can be ugly, but I assumed that I could avoid all of the ugliness by staying true to my values,” wrote David Shulkin. “I have been falsely accused of things by people who wanted me out of the way.”

It’s not difficult to believe in the truth of David Shulkin’s words. In Donald Trump’s administration, it seems that whether it’s by simply disagreeing with him, or whether it’s by conducting a legal investigation involving him, anyone who might make things difficult for the President should consider his or her days to be numbered. David Shulkin appears to be just the latest manifestation of this.

Ousted Veterans Affairs Head Writes Op-ed on Firing | Fox News [2018-03-29]

David Shulkin Slams Political Climate after Being Fired | CBS This Morning [2018-03-29]