Marjory Stoneman Douglas Shooting: Don’t Say ‘Gun Control’

Shortly after the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida last week, Florida Governor Rick Scott responded to challenges concerning how he planned to move forward with gun control. The massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas was the 18th school shooting since the start of 2018.

“We have to look at these things and say to ourselves, our primary goal is school safety. I don’t want to tramp on anyone’s constitutional rights, but we’ve got to focus on keeping these kids safe.”

When asked directly if his plans included making gun control laws stricter, Scott responded, “…We’re going to figure out how, moving forward, this never happens again. I’m going to do everything I can to make sure this never happens again.”

Scott said that the Florida State legislature assured him that they’d be very supportive of working through what needs to be done. “I’ve asked for funding for school safety…We’re going to figure this out.” But Scott repeatedly avoided directly addressing the issue of making gun laws stricter.

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked, “Are you ready to commit your political team to work to tighten gun restrictions in the state of Florida?”

“Everything’s on the table…I’m going to do everything I can to keep these kids safe,” responded Scott.

Earlier this week, 100 students, survivors of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, traveled seven hours to Tallahassee to watch the Florida House of Representatives vote on a motion for debate on a gun control bill. The bill, introduced by Democratic State Representative Carlos Guillermo Smith, would ban the sale of assault weapons and large capacity magazines. It would have classified the AR-15 as an assault weapon, and banned it.

Governor Scott’s earlier assurance that he and lawmakers would “do whatever they could” to ensure that a mass shooting never happens again in Florida schools clearly did not mean that “doing whatever they could” would include examining tighter gun control measures. The Florida House of Representatives voted down the motion for debate, 71-36.

Apparently, a greater risk to the public is pornography. During the same session, the Florida House of Representatives passed a bill that declared pornography a public health risk.

“Unfortunately, just five days after 17 people were gunned down at a Florida school, the Florida House just passed a bill that declares pornography a public health risk,” said Congressman Smith. “Basically, what they have just determined is that these are the Republican priorities in 2018. Wasting our time with debate and legislation that declares porn a health threat. Meanwhile, we can’t even get a single debate, vote, or hearing on anything related to assault weapons.”

When asked why the House voted down even considering such a bill, Republican State Representative Matt Caldwell replied, “The worst outcome in my mind is that we put forth some proposal, we ban something just at a whim, without really going through the time or the process. And it (restricting sale of assault weapons) doesn’t make any difference. So next time you have a school shooting, then what do you say?

There is no record of anyone walking into a building and using pornography to take lives in the span of three minutes, as has happened with an AR-15 assault rifle. Yet, Republicans, at least in Florida, appear to see porn as a greater health risk than a semiautomatic weapon in the hands of a disturbed individual. If this is the prevalent mentality, and if we continue to avoid the issue of tighter gun control, the odds are that what happened at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, will happen again somewhere.
Florida Gov. Rick Scott Challenged on Gun Laws | [2018-02-15]

Lawmakers Pass on Gun Debate, Vote to Say Porn is Dangerous | CNN [2018-02-21]

Sen. Nelson: What Will it Take to Stop School Shootings? | Fox News [2018-02-14]

The Devin Nunes Memo: What Does It Prove?

The Devin Nunes Memo is an example of how two opposing sides can each view the same contents of the same document as supporting their position. On February 2, Donald Trump approved the release of the memo, against the wishes of several of his appointees. The Devin Nunes Memo accuses the FBI of abusing its use of surveillance powers to monitor Carter Page, who, at the time, was a Trump advisor.

The Devin Nunes Memo alleges that the FBI used information from the Steele Dossier to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil Page. The idea that the dossier, which barely mentions Carter Page, was the primary basis for getting the warrant, raises questions. The memo argues that the FBI showed bias against the Trump campaign by monitoring Page without substantiated data. As early as 2013, however – long before Carter Page was associated with the Trump administration – the FBI suspected Page of spying on behalf of the Russians, due to his apparent connections with the Russian mob.

The FISA warrant to surveil Carter Page was renewed three times. Each renewal required proof that the surveillance has elicited new evidence that the subject of the monitoring is an agent of a foreign power. Four separate judges signed off on the FISA warrant and its renewals. Each of the judges who signed off on the warrant or the renewals was a Republican appointee.

South Carolina Republican House Representative Trey Gowdy, one of the authors of the Devin Nunes memo, says, that, though the memo may raise questions about the process the FBI used to get the FISA warrant, it does not impact the Russia investigation. It also does not “vindicate” Trump, as Trump tweeted it did.

The dossier, Gowdy said, “(also) has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower, nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica, nothing to do with obstruction of justice, and nothing to do with George Papadapoulos’ meeting in Great Britain.” The goal of the memo seems to be little more than to sow reasonable doubt.

The Devin Nunes memo seems to ask more questions than it answers. Republicans are inclined to see the memo as evidence that the Russia investigation is a nothing more than a witchhunt. Others, who feel the investigation should continue, could look to the Devin Nunes Memo as support for their position, as well.

Wallace: Troubling Details in Nunes Memo; is it Full Story? |  Fox News [2018-02-02]

Trey Gowdy Breaks with Trump on Nunes Memo |  CNN [2018-02-04]