Mueller Investigation a Real Witch Hunt?

Donald Trump has used the phrase “witch hunt” so often in recent months that the term has lost its potency. Trump casually tosses the term around via Twitter with frequency. His references to Robert Mueller’s investigation of the Trump campaign’s connections with Russia as a witch hunt appear to have accomplished Trump’s apparent goal of diminishing the legitimacy of the investigation – at least to his supporters.

Of Trump’s supporters, 51 percent disapprove of the Mueller investigation, and just 43 percent support it. Overall, 69 percent of Americans support the Mueller investigation.

The modern definition of a witch hunt is “an attempt to find and punish a particular group of people who are being blamed for something, often simply because of their opinions and not because they have actually done anything wrong,” according to the Collins Dictionary.

The origins of the term, of course, harken back to the days of the Salem witch trials. Today, people are fond of applying the term “witch hunt” hyperbolically when they feel – or want to appear – wrongly targeted or scrutinized, even if the application of the term is ridiculous and has no real parallel.

In the 1692 Salem Village witch hunt, those who were accused of witchcraft were held without a fair investigation. Nineteen accused people were hanged, and one was crushed to death. Their “guilt” was based on hearsay and mass hysteria, and little or no real evidence. Robert Mueller’s “witch hunt,” on the other hand, has been a year-long, careful endeavor, aimed at finding facts and amassing solid evidence.

“…Trump comparing the investigation into his campaign to a crisis that left 20 people dead in the 17th century is clearly ridiculous — there is much more evidence in the criminal indictments, the court-sanctioned wiretaps, and the consensus of Republican and Democratic investigators for Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election than there is for witchcraft — and rather unsavory,” write Dylan Scott and Tara Isabella Burton, of Vox.

In 17th-century Salem Village, the (mostly) women who were charged did not have the option to loudly undercut their accusers. They had no support; those who might have supported them lived in fear of being accused themselves. Regarding Robert Mueller’s “witch hunt,” on the other hand, Trump feels free to speak and tweet his opinion.

“You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history – led by some very bad and conflicted people!” Trump tweeted on June 15, 2017.

“It would seem very hard to obstruct justice for a crime that never happened! Witch Hunt!” tweeted Trump on May 1, 2018.

“This is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history!” he tweeted on May 18, 2018.

“We’ve turned the expression on its head. Traditionally a witchcraft charge amounted to powerful men charging powerless women with a phony crime. Now it is powerful men screeching that they are being charged with phony crimes,” says Stacey Schiff, author of The Witches, a book about the Salem witch trials.

Hyperbole, though, is Donald Trump’s style. Misappropriation of terms is a Trump hallmark, as is good old-fashioned gaslighting. But to Trump’s supporters, the more often he tosses out the phrase “witch hunt” in a tweet, the more they see the idea as truth.

Donald Trump’s ‘Witch Hunt’ | HuffPost [2018-04-11]

Trump slams Mueller probe calling it a ‘witch hunt’ | Fox Business [2018-03-19]

Sadler’s Remarks re: John McCain: A New White House Low

In a recent comment aimed at Senator John McCain (R-AZ) by White House aide Kelly Sadler, we saw the Trump Administration reach yet another new low. Sadler dismissed McCain’s reservations about Trump’s nomination of Gina Haspel as Head of the CIA by saying, “It doesn’t matter, he’s dying anyway.” Though Sadler has since apologized by phone to John McCain’s daughter, Meghan, for the remark, Donald Trump has yet to apologize, or even address it.

John McCain had strongly opposed the President’s CIA nominee, Gina Haspel, over her role in enhanced interrogations, namely, waterboarding, saying “Her refusal to acknowledge torture’s immorality is disqualifying.” McCain himself was tortured during his 5 ½ years as a POW in VietNam.

Even after many have publicly wondered why Sadler still has her job, the White House has refrained from responding. Though it may be extreme to fire Sadler for her comment regarding John McCain, insensitive as it was, one wonders why the White House, in its silence over the issue, appears to support it. But as we’ve learned, apology isn’t Donald Trump’s style.

Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) said, regarding Trump’s apparent refusal to address Sadler’s comment, “It doesn’t hurt you at all to do the right thing and be big.”

This administration has demonstrated time and again that it does not see honor and respect as worthwhile traits. Perhaps worse than Kelly Sadler’s remarks about John McCain were those of Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney, who defended the practice of torture and disparaged McCain, all in one sentence, when he said on Fox Business, “It worked on John (McCain). That’s why they call him Songbird John.”

Though McInerney was implying that torture caused John McCain to give in to his captors under pressure, there is no evidence of this, though there is evidence that McCain gave false information to his captors. Incidentally, no one refers to John McCain as “Songbird John.” The Fox Business host, Charles V. Payne, apologized for his guest’s remark.

Regarding John McCain’s status as a war hero, Trump has declared that because McCain was captured, he was not a hero. “I like people who weren’t captured,” said Trump, a person who, indeed, escaped going to war, let alone being captured.

Donald Trump and his administration are defining a new standard of acceptable behavior toward others, and it’s not a higher standard. Though it involves “speaking one’s mind” and not apologizing, it does not involve bravery or courageousness. Though it consists in what some would call “candor,” it does not espouse truthfulness.

A large number of Americans remain adamant that Trump and his administration don’t represent who we are. And surely, Trump’s Republican party is not the Republican party of John McCain. But it seems that with every utterance of “That’s not who we are,” we learn of yet one more small breakdown of the foundation that once would have found Kelly Sadler’s John McCain comments horrifying – each taking us a small step farther along the path of who we are now becoming as a nation.

Fox host apologized after comments about ‘songbird’ John McCain | The Oregonian [2018-05-11]

White House refuses to address McCain comments made by aide |  ABC News [2018-05-11]