Michelle Wolf Was Successful Despite Saturday’s Dearth of Laughter

It’s hard to know for sure whether Comedian Michelle Wolf, whose performance at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner last Saturday is by now widely known, actually got the result she had intended. She did draw some laughter, although much of it was uncomfortable. People from both parties have expressed shock and distaste, but if that is what Michelle Wolf was going for, after all, then her performance was a success.

On the other hand, instead of taking offense, many are praising Michelle Wolf for her equivalent of “telling it like it is” (Let’s remember who this characteristic has most often been attributed to in recent times). Others say that in light of the tasteless comments, insensitive remarks, and cruel opining that Trump and his administration are now known for, Michelle Wolf was just responding in kind. Again, despite the lack of laughs in the room, this indicates that Wolf succeeded, really, at what she set out to do.

If one is trying to make a point to a group one strongly opposes, however, is insulting, rant-heavy monologue the best tack to take? Does stooping to the same level of vindictive, vulgar, offensive commentary really make the intended point?

“We’ve had awkward dinners before, no question. But this is a different time,” says USA Today Washington Bureau Chief Susan Page. “…This week, a poll came out by Quinnipiac that showed that the majority of Republicans believe the press is the enemy of the American people, not a defender of democracy. That is an impression that we need to do everything we can to show that that is not true, that that is not the case, and that we’re motivated not by partisanship, but by a search for the truth.”

Perhaps, as some have remarked, the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner has begun to take itself too seriously. Michelle Wolf, says Masha Gessen of The New Yorker, “blasted open the fictions of journalism” with Saturday’s performance. Nevertheless, the White House Correspondents’ Association has supported the work of journalism in several ways, providing, among other things, scholarships for journalism students.

Donald Trump and his ilk have made every effort to discredit and belittle American journalists and the press, in general. Michelle Wolf’s set on Saturday did nothing to elevate the press in the eyes of the GOP.

“I’m someone who has dinged President Trump often for his narcissism,” said Los Angeles Times Columnist Jonah Goldberg. “The institutional narcissism that was on display (last night) at the correspondents’ dinner I think was a gift to Donald Trump. The crudeness toward Sarah Huckabee Sanders was a gift to the White House. It lets them double down on their ‘These elites are persecuting us’ storyline.”

No matter what Michelle Wolf’s intent was with her comedy set on Saturday, and no matter whether she succeeded or failed that night, we can be almost certain of her success as a self-promoter. No publicity is bad publicity. She may not have been well-known this time last week, and she may not be very funny, but the name Michelle Wolf is now trending globally.

Did Michelle Wolf go too far at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner? | Face the Nation [2018-04-29]

Comedy writer: WHCD was vicious, not funny | Fox News [04-29-2018]

Not All Evangelicals Want to Be Associated with Trumpism

Although Donald Trump’s base consists largely of white evangelicals, not all evangelicals see Trump as the Anointed One. To those who do, however, speaking out against Trump, his behavior, or his policies, is akin to blasphemy. Indeed, many evangelicals appear to have embraced the dogma of “Trumpism” as part of their Christian theology.

Last week, however, about 50 evangelicals, concerned about the negative perception of American evangelicals, met at Wheaton College, a conservative Christian school in Illinois, to discuss the future of the evangelical movement in the era of Donald Trump as president. Several who attended the invitation-only gathering left after the first day, offended by the “fault-finding” toward Donald Trump and his supporters, and characterizing the event as a “Trump bashing.”

Many are concerned that, to the rest of the world, including Americans who don’t support Trump, “evangelical” is synonymous with “Trump supporter.” And they’re concerned that “Trump supporter,” in turn, is associated with white racism, divisiveness, and nationalism.

“When you Google evangelicals, you get Trump,” said Doug Birdsall, honorary chair of the international evangelical movement Lausanne, and organizer of the Wheaton event. “When people say what does it mean to be an evangelical, people don’t say evangelism or the gospel. There’s a grotesque caricature of what it means to be an evangelical.”

“Trumpist” evangelicals stress that whomever God puts into office is there for His purpose (except, apparently, Barack Obama). Indeed, it’s easy to see God’s hand in the matter when the one who wins the election appears to further your agenda. The evangelicals are pleased with Trump’s judicial appointments, and they’re over the moon with Trump’s decision to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem (putting things in place for some elements of Biblical prophecy to come true, they believe).

Yet, despite Trump’s “pro-Christian” moves (does anyone really believe Donald Trump makes any decision on the basis of its “Christ-centeredness”?) a growing number of evangelicals feel that association with Trump has tainted the movement.

It’s difficult to understand how a group of people who claim to follow the teachings of a man (Christ) who is believed to symbolize goodness, mercy, love, and empathy, can reconcile their political choice of a modern-day leader (Trump) who is the antithesis of those qualities. On the other hand, it’s refreshing to know that some members of that same group find the association with Trump to be repugnant.

“No matter what happens to American evangelicalism, it is here to stay, says Darrell Block, of Dallas Theological Seminary, and a co-organizer of the gathering in Wheaton. Perhaps, but will we ever be able to undo the negative association of evangelicalism with Donald Trump? It may be that the only hope for those evangelicals who don’t want to associate themselves with Trumpism is to change the name of their movement.

Faith leaders reportedly hold anti-Trump meeting  |  Fox News [2018-04-19]

Leaders Criticize Trump right or wrong???   |  [2018-04-19] Truth Time Radio