The March for Our Lives: Where Its Power Lies

A headline from this past weekend reads “NRA Takes Aim at ‘March for Our Lives Rally, Mocks Gun Violence Survivors.” Did we expect otherwise? Mockery and deflection, along with alarmist tactics, are always available as easy tools for trying to ruffle an opponent or sway popular opinion. The March for Our Lives, however, could, despite the NRA’s attempts to belittle it, prove to be very powerful, and the sentiments it inspired are likely to continue to gain momentum.

The March for Our Lives, a nationwide protest against gun violence, organized by survivors of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School mass shooting, took place last Saturday, March 24, in Washington, D.C., with numerous “sister” marches taking place around the world.

“Not one more,” reads the March for Our Lives mission statement. “We cannot allow one more child to be shot at school. We cannot allow one more teacher to make a choice to jump in front of a firing assault rifle to save the lives of students. We cannot allow one more family to wait for a call or text that never comes. Our schools are unsafe. Our children and teachers are dying. We must make it our top priority to save these lives.”

Yes, the March for Our Lives received a large amount of funding and social media support from well-known names such as the Clooneys and others in Hollywood. It does take money to pull off such a large-scale event. Are we as upset about the funding that some of our representatives in Congress get for supporting the NRA?

Yes, the March for Our Lives was well-organized. This, along with the fact that it was funded by some celebrities, has inspired the narrative that the organizers, who were all witnesses to horrific gun violence, were puppets of the “liberal anti-gun lobby.” This idea seems weak, unless one is a conspiracy theorist who also believes that the Parkland shootings were staged by the “anti-gun left” so that people would hold international gun violence demonstrations because they want to “take away all of our guns.”

The NRA and its supporters, in the aftermath of every school shooting and every other mass shooting in the U.S., panic about the possibility of losing their right to possess assault-type weapons, while dismissing or ridiculing those who point out the horror and devastation such weapons have caused, and almost certainly will cause again. That way of prioritization doesn’t seem at all strange to them.

The March for Our Lives took place at a time when Congress had already finished passing legislation for the year. Some will see that as waste. The organization states that “ The mission and focus of March For Our Lives is to demand that a comprehensive and effective bill be immediately brought before Congress to address these gun issues.”

A great deal of the power of the March for Our Lives, however, will come from the fact that it included a large drive to register voters. Many of those newly registered voters are impassioned young people who have been watching their peers work to effect change around gun control laws while the adults appear to have done nothing. All of them will be able to vote in the 2018 mid-term elections. Indeed, the March for Our Lives could have an even larger impact than simply introducing immediate legislation – it could, through votes, replace the climate of the current Congress with one that is no longer controlled by the gun lobby.

Millions Join #MarchForOurLives For Gun Control | The View  [2018-03-26]

 

 

Gutfeld on Saturday’s Gun Control March | Fox News [2018-03-26]

White House Weekend Firing: Andrew McCabe

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was fired on Friday evening, 26 hours before he would have been able to retire and qualify for his full Federal pension, at least some of which may now be at risk. In keeping with what is becoming a classic move by the Trump administration, McCabe heard about his firing from a friend – before he was told by either the White House or by FBI Director Christopher Wray. Though Attorney General Jeff Sessions emailed Andrew McCabe to fire him, McCabe didn’t see Sessions’ firing statement until after it had become television news.

Andrew McCabe supervised the FBI investigation of the Hillary Clinton email scandal, in which Clinton was found to have used a private email server for government correspondence. McCabe also oversaw the investigation of collusion by Russia in Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

Since Andrew McCabe is a career Civil Service employees and not a political appointee, Donald Trump did not have the power to fire McCAbe. Instead, Trump prevailed on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire him.

Sessions stated that Andrew McCabe was fired for alleged misconduct, and that career officials at the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had also recommended terminating McCabe. An internal review by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is understood to say that Andrew McCabe “misled investigators about his role in directing other officials at the FBI to speak to The Wall Street Journal about his involvement in a public corruption investigation into the Clinton Foundation.”

According to Sessions, “The FBI’s OPR then reviewed the report and underlying documents and issued a disciplinary proposal recommending the dismissal of Mr. McCabe. Both the OIG and FBI OPR reports concluded that Mr. McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor − including under oath − on multiple occasions.”

Donald Trump has been waging a Twitter battle against Andrew McCabe for months. Trump seems obsessed with the idea that McCabe’s wife, Jill, who ran for a Virginia State Senate seat (and was defeated), received nearly $700,000 from Hilary Clinton for her campaign, and, that a “pro-Clinton” bias within the FBI was the reason why Clinton was never charged with regard to the email server investigation.

In reality, it was not Hilary Clinton who made the donation to Jill McCabe’s campaign, it was Common Good VA, a PAC controlled by Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, who made the contribution. What’s more, the timeline makes this even less relevant; Jill McCabe ran for the Senate (and was defeated) in 2015. Andrew McCabe did not become Deputy Director of the FBI until 2016.

In light of this, the question that first arose in January, when Andrew McCabe announced his intent to retire, remains: With Andrew McCabe gone, is the way clear to eliminate Robert Mueller?

‘The Five’ on Fallout from the Firing of Andrew McCabe | Fox News [2018-03-19]

How Will Andrew McCabe’s Firing Affect the Mueller Probe? | PBS News Hour [2018-03-19]