What is the Greatest Trump-era Failure?

Donald Trump’s administration has shown that sometimes, failures in politics occur not only by the voting down of policies or the dismissal of politicians, but also by the character of the people and events involved in those politics – and how the people respond (or don’t) to certain situations. The past week’s news has underlined this point, as many Republican lawmakers demonstrate their continued support of Donald Trump and his actions – by doing nothing.

On January 11, while singling out Haiti, as well as El Salvador and countries in Africa, Trump reportedly said, “Why are we having all of these people from s***hole countries come here?” He went on to say, “Why do we need more Haitians? Take them out” (presumably meaning “take them off the list of countries with temporary protected status”).

People in the U.S. and around the world are offended by Trump’s comments, and have found them to be blatantly and painfully racist. Nevertheless, Donald Trump has not apologized for the remarks. He denied making them at first, and later said, in effect, that his “tough language” was what was needed. He went on to blame, in part, Democrats’ response to the remarks for holding up progress on immigration reform. When a president’s offensive words are turned around so that those who were offended, rather than the offender, become the problem, that is a leadership failure.

If this were the first time Donald Trump had made disparaging remarks about a country or group of people, he might have cleared the air by acknowledging that he’d made a mistake, and apologizing. Instead, Trump has admitted no wrongdoing. When a President (or any politician) refuses to take responsibility for his or her own actions and words, that is a leadership failure.

Though a few Republicans such as Mitt Romney, Jeff Flake, and Lindsey Graham have publicly decried what Trump said, other key Republicans such as Mitch McConnell have remained silent. When it’s more important to “save your seat than to save your soul” (as was suggested by David Gergen, former Presidential Adviser), that is a political failure.

The news is full of video clips of Trump making slurs over the years, similar to those he made last week. The news and social media outlets are also full of commentary about whether what Trump said was, indeed, a slur, whether people should be offended, and what Trump really meant. It’s a failure when it becomes more important to debate whether something said was racist or offensive, rather than striving to move ahead and apologize to those who were offended. It’s a failure when the debate becomes over what exact word was used, and ignores the sentiment behind the words.

Regarding the past week’s comments, as well as his similar remarks in the past, Trump has stated repeatedly that he’s not a racist. It’s a leadership failure when a president spends more time and fervor verbally denying that he is a racist than he does actually taking action to demonstrate that he’s not.

Many continue to defend and even praise Donald Trump for “speaking his mind,” no matter what we discover is in his mind. His supporters make excuses for his words, assign alternate meanings to them, and belittle those who find them troubling. When supporters and politicians show an inability or refusal to acknowledge a problem with any of Donald Trump’s words or actions – especially his most recent ones – this is perhaps the greatest failure.

Shields and Brooks on Trump’s ‘s***hole’ Comments, ‘Fire and Fury’ Fallout | PBS News Hour [2018-01-12]

Tucker: Trump Forced Conversation Leaders Want to Avoid | Fox News [2018-01-13]

Below is a clip of global responses to Trump’s comments. NOTE: The following clip contains the frequent use of vulgarity.

‘We’re Not S**holes. We’re People’: Global Responses to Trump’s Remarks |  Washington Post [2018-01-12]

The Trump White House: Fire and Fury, or Fired and Furious?

A new and provocative book by Michael Wolff, Fire and Fury: Inside Trump’s White House, is due out next week. Chronicling Donald Trump’s first year in the White House, the book’s content and expository style paint a vivid picture of a Trump Administration that is corrupt at worst, and inept and unequipped at best.

Wolff claims to have gathered much of the material in his book as a result of his access to former key figures in the Trump administration, most notably, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. Bannon had at one time been considered to be close to the President, but was ultimately pressured to leave his post. So far, Bannon has neither denied nor confirmed the damning commentary Wolff purports Bannon has made about the Trumps and the Administration.

Amid both the indignation (if you’re a Trump supporter) and the fascination (if you’re not a Trump supporter), lingers a question (speaking of former key staffers): Why has the Trump administration seen so many staff departures in such a short time?

The following White House staff have either resigned or been fired during the first year of the Trump presidency:

  • Sally Yates, then acting Attorney General (January 30, 2017)
  • Michael Flynn, National Security Advisor (February 13, 2017)
  • Angella Reid, Chief Usher (May 5, 2017)
  • James Comey, FBI Director (May 9, 2017)
  • Mike Dubke, Communications Director (May 18, 2017)
  • Walter Shaub, Director of Office of Government Ethics (July 6, 2017)
  • Sean Spicer, White House Press Secretary (July 21, 2017)
  • Michael Short, Senior Assistant Press Secretary (July 25, 2017)
  • Reince Priebus, White House Chief of Staff (July 28, 2017)
  • Anthony Scaramucci, Communications Director (July 31, 2017)
  • Steve Bannon, Chief Strategist (August 18, 2017)
  • Sebastian Gorka, Counterterrorism Adviser (August 25, 2017)
  • Tom Price, Health and Human Services Secretary (September 29, 2017)
  • Dina Powell, Deputy National Security Advisor (December 8, 2017)
  • Omarosa Manigault Newman, White House Office of Public Liaison (December 13, 2017)

Some see the short tenure of so many White House staffers as an indicator of dysfunction within the Administration. Others consider it a sign that Trump himself simply made poor or uninformed choices.

Many staunch Trump supporters, such as former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci, who himself lasted in the Administration just 11 days, assert that the relatively large turnover of key staff is all in the day’s work of a tightly run business.

Credible or not, Fire and Fury has ignited many of the topics that are dominating current news and raising new questions about the health of the Trump White House, including speculation about Trump’s fitness for office; proclamations about the integrity of Steve Bannon, among others; more intense questions about collusion between Russia and the Trump family; and observations of infighting among Trump staffers.

It will be nearly impossible to “unsee” what we’ve now seen as a result of Wolff’s book, no matter what we believe about the Trump Administration or those who have surrounded him.

Scaramucci Defends Trump, Bashes Steve Bannon (Full Interview) | CNN [2017-01-04]

Steve Bannon Goes Rogue on the Trump White House  |  Fox News [2018-01-03]

Below is Sarah Sanders’ most recent White House press briefing, where she addresses questions related to content in Fire and Fury: Inside Trump’s White House.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders White House Press Briefing | Right Side Broadcasting Network [2017-01-03]