Editorial: The 2020 Election is the Peaceful Demonstration of a Lifetime

I’ve been thinking about the day in 2017, Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day, when so many of us participated in the Women’s Marches that took place across the country and around the world. I remember how some people, women as well as men, ridiculed and even scolded those of us who took part, thus proving our point. (“Silly girls in your little pink hats,” they might as well have said.) Others took to social media to proclaim that they, as women, certainly didn’t know why we needed a Women’s March. Some men—well, I remember the memes.

Back then, I stooped to arguing with some of them, but it only served to dignify their position—The position that we should all just be quiet and be grateful; stop complaining about nothing; how ridiculous that we should be worried about our rights and protections and treatment. (Some of those people who belittled us then are now, three years later, complaining about their rights to refuse to wear a tiny piece of fabric on their faces to help protect the health and well-being of others.)

As a white, middle class woman, yes, I am quite grateful for what I have, and for privilege I probably don’t even realize that I have taken for granted. I am also angry about what many women (and people, in general) who are different from me…people of color, people in the LGBTQ community, the poor, the abused, the seriously ill… continue to be denied, or fear losing. I am fearful for the future, and for what my daughters may be denied, or may lose, as women, and as women of color.

I am fearful that some of those who have not experienced hardship, hunger, discrimination, racism, poverty, or legally sanctioned cruelty will continue to feel enabled to proclaim that since they haven’t experienced those things, those things don’t exist. (Example: “Systemic racism doesn’t exist,” says Donald Trump, and, consequently, those who parrot him.)

I am fearful that those proclamations will continue to be justifications for further eroding or ending health care; safety; the right, as women, to have autonomy over our bodies (and no, pro-choice does not mean you’d automatically choose abortion); the right to create a life with the person we love, no matter what their gender; the right to not fear for one’s life during a traffic stop, simply because of one’s skin color.

But in January of 2017, we were all supposed to be quiet and “give Trump a chance,” because otherwise, our concerns were just “drama,” and we were “whining.”

Now, three years later, our lives are most definitely worse under Trump’s “chance.”

Millions stand to lose health care (does it really need to be said again that even if you have private health insurance, the loss of the Affordable Care Act, aka “Obamacare” will impact the laws that govern private insurance, too?). This administration has tried, more than 60 times, to abolish “Obamacare,” and without a replacement. Now they have a SCOTUS justice whom the conservative groups are over the moon about because they believe she will support those efforts, as well as their “pro-life” agenda. And we’ve been left to fend for ourselves with a virus that has been abandoned by President “Give-him-a-Chance.”

Our economy? Right. Well, it’s been great for the wealthy, but as a result of our president’s failed response to the coronavirus pandemic, countless businesses have suffered or failed, job loss has skyrocketed, and many Americans are depending on food pantries to feed their families.

Trump’s supporters like to blame America’s financial hardship on the “Democrat lockdowns.” But had we all, as a nation, acted like responsible adults for a few weeks, and all sheltered, worn masks, and believed the pubic health experts from the beginning, the virus wouldn’t be raging in the U.S. as it is now, threatening more closures and loss. Had the White House had a plan for managing the spread from the beginning, countless lives, jobs, and businesses could have been saved. The White House still has no plan, and instead, has clearly demonstrated a complete lack of regard for whether Americans live or die.

Most Americans have suffered some kind of loss related to this deadly, cruel virus that, thanks to Donald Trump’s messaging, some still don’t believe is even real. But by god, this is a free country and no one can take away our liberty not to wear a mask, or our freedom to crowd together with thousands of others at a rally. Two hundred twenty-seven thousand lives is a small price to pay for those freedoms, and for “opening up the economy” (which never really closed in some areas of the country). “It is what it is.”

People whose hearts were oozing with hate, prejudice, and ugliness even before the 2016 election are now emboldened to speak their hideous truth out loud, and even act it out. They feel supported as they try to intimidate peaceful protesters and voters, threaten innocent bystanders who look “different,” or who are simply wearing masks; and they feel righteously triggered by signs in the suburbs that say “Black Lives Matter.”

And what do you think it’s like to be a Black person or other person of color right now? Or an immigrant with dark skin who prefers to speak in her native language with her family on the subway?

By the way, I got a Covid test this week. My second one. This one hurt more than the last one. I actually began to cry as I pulled away from the testing tent. I don’t think it was because of the Covid test.

We have just a few days to stop another coronavirus super-spreader event— the inauguration of Donald Trump for his second term. We have four days days to show up to this, the most crucial peaceful demonstration of our lives. Four days to vote Donald Trump and his enablers off the face of the earth.

Coronavirus surges increase uncertainty over economy, says Elevation Partners’ Roger McNamee | CNBC [2020-10-28]

Obama Takes Hard Swings At Trump While Campaigning In Florida |
NBC News NOW 
[2020-10-27]

Editorial: Voter Intimidation and Suppression are Illegal, and Our President Openly Encourages Both

Voter intimidation and suppression are illegal, as is election tampering. Yet our current president continues to openly support and encourage all three, evidently in fear that those are the only ways to ensure that he wins re-election. In few areas are Trump’s authoritarian ambitions more apparent than in his efforts at voter suppression and intimidation, as well as election tampering; and even if some guns, harassment, or violence happen to be in the mix, so be it.

Donald Trump has insisted that the only way he will lose the 2020 presidential election is if the Democrats cheat. Having already nursed his supporters’ distrust of anyone but himself and those associated with him, Trump has also persuaded his base to believe his narrative about election results. Trump’s desperate crafting of such an outcome expectation has set the stage for his supporters to refuse to accept any election outcome other than Trump’s re-election. This, in itself, is election tampering by Donald Trump. Cheating, even.

When it became clear that the coronavirus pandemic would stretch beyond the summer and into the time of the presidential election, it also became apparent that polling venues would be risky places to be on Election Day. Consequently, many states decided to make it easier for their residents to vote by mail in order to protect them from contracting the virus while voting, as well as make voting generally more accessible for every voter.

Donald Trump has used the situation as another opportunity to meddle with the election by insisting that voting by mail leads to widespread voter fraud. Though it’s true that more Democrats than Republicans vote by mail, both Republican-led and Democrat-led states have successfully carried out past elections that were largely by mail-in ballot, with negligible voter fraud. Trump, however, continues to try to promote mistrust in voting by mail, and his administration has initiated several lawsuits to try to stop voting by mail. If more voters vote (and more mail-in voting ensures that more voters will vote), it is a threat to a Trump victory.

Over the summer, as if to reinforce his scheme to prevent successful mail-in voting, Trump appointed top campaign donor Louis DeJoy as Postmaster General of the U.S. Postal Service. DeJoy soon issued “cost-savings measures” that included reductions in service; decommissioning of hundreds of mail sorting machines; removal of numerous blue mailboxes across the country; and abolishing the overtime needed to ensure that all of the day’s mail is processed and delivered in a timely manner. DeJoy’s actions brought into question whether he would, intentionally or unintentionally, prevent mail-in ballots from arriving in time to be counted in the election.

Following challenges by Congress and by consumers, DeJoy pulled back on his plan to continue decommissioning postal machines and removing mailboxes. By that time, however, many machines had already been taken out of service, and many mailboxes had already been removed. Further, many Americans’ faith in the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail-in ballots on time had been eroded.

For those who will not be casting their votes by mail, the polling places have begun to open for early voting. As evidenced by the hours-long lines of voters waiting to cast their votes, Donald Trump’s efforts have not squelched voter enthusiasm, nor have they prevented votes from being cast in any fashion.

As Donald Trump has seen that nothing will deter voters from voting in the 2020 election, he has now called for an army of his supporters to deem themselves “poll watchers,” and go to voting places to “watch very carefully” as voters exercise their right to vote.

“I’m urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully because that’s what has to happen,” Said Trump at his first presidential debate against former Vice President Joe Biden. “I am urging them to do it.”

Sean Morales-Doyle, deputy director of the Brennan Center’s voting rights and elections program, has said that many states have laws that dictate who is allowed to be in a polling place at a given time, including who is permitted to be a poll watcher, and what a poll watcher is allowed to do.

“There are laws like this in many states,” says Morales-Doyle. “Regular citizens can’t just take it upon themselves to engage in this kind of poll watching, and for good reason, because it opens up the possibility of voter intimidation, of vigilantism, which the president is seemingly encouraging. But it is illegal.”

Many Democratic leaders and election officials, including Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford, also fear voter intimidation, and particularly, suppression of Black voters and other voters of color. Ford tweeted that Trump wasn’t referring to standard poll watching, but instead was calling for “voter intimidation.”

“Voter intimidation is illegal in Nevada. Believe me when I say it: You do it, and you will be prosecuted,” said Ford.

“The President is openly urging his supporters to congregate at polling places, go inside, and ostensibly harass and intimidate voters,” said Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring. “While there are authorized ‘poll watchers’ who monitor polls on Election Day, their duties are clearly laid out, and they do not include what President Trump has suggested.”

During early voting at one location in Fairfax, Virginia, a group of about 50 Trump supporters gathered, waving Trump 2020 banners, wrapping themselves in American flags, and shouting, “Four more years! Four more years!” Though the group hadn’t violated any election laws, some voters felt threatened, and requested escorts into the building.

In Michigan, fearing that unauthorized “poll watching” by Trump’s supporters could turn violent, the state has banned open carry of guns at polling places on Election Day, as well as at places where absentee ballots are counted.

Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said that the Michigan directive prohibits the open carry of firearms “in a polling place, in any hallway used by voters to enter or exit, or within 100 feet of any entrance to a building in which a polling place is located.”

Donald Trump would like to abolish “liberty and justice for all” by using his supporters, the very people who claim to wield their guns in support of “liberty and justice” (at least for some), to help him accomplish his goal. He has shown that he would do anything to prevent an election result that is not in his favor, including stopping the mail, and even postponing the election (which can’t be done without an act of Congress).

Trump may fantasize about winning re-election, no matter what, and he may fantasize even more about being an authoritarian leader, but Americans in large numbers have shown how dogged they are when it comes to the standing up against the attempts by the president and his enablers to prevent them from casting their votes in this election.

After all votes are counted, may the total be against the one who wanted to suppress and intimidate voters, and may it be in favor of the candidate who will work for “liberty and justice,” not just for some, but for all.

Trump’s “poll watcher” comments raise concerns about voter intimidation |
CBS News [2020-10-06]

Trump Supporters Disrupt Early Voting in Virginia | Now This News
[2020-09-22]