Editorial: Trump’s Rally in Tulsa: A Bigly Unfilled Arena

Donald Trump was clearly an unhappy man as he made what Twitter users have referred to as his walk of shame back to the White House following Saturday’s campaign rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The Trump campaign had boasted earlier that they had received 1 million RSVPs to the event. On the night of the rally, however, fewer than 6,200 showed up, leaving almost two-thirds of the 19,000 seats empty in the BOK Center, where the rally was held. Trump and some of his allies would like to blame everyone but Donald Trump, himself.

Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale blamed the media. “The fact is that a week’s worth of the fake news media warning people away from the rally because of Covid and protesters, coupled with recent images of American cities on fire, had a real impact on people bringing their families and children to the rally,” he said.

Apparently, Parscale thinks that the threat of contracting COVID-19 was just hype, and should not be a deterrent from large indoor public gatherings. It would also seem that protesters and “American cities on fire” are nothing more than nuisances deterring Donald Trump from having a successful ego-stoking event.

Parscale also blamed local Tulsa law enforcement for the low crowd numbers, saying that police had “overreacted,” and had barred entry to “thousands” of supporters who tried to get into the BOK Center for the rally. He blamed Black Lives Matter protesters, too, for trying to keep rally-goers away. Reporters say, however, that, other than some verbal confrontations between MAGAs and BLM protesters, no one had barred attendees from entering BOK Center.

Trump, too, blamed a combination of protesters and the media, notably not making any distinction between “thugs” and peaceful protesters.

“You are warriors,” said Trump to the small rally crowd. … “We had some very bad people outside. They were doing bad things.”

“I’ve been watching the fake news for weeks now,” he continued. “…And everything is negative: Don’t go, don’t come, don’t do anything.”

If there is any speculation about throngs of Trump supporters trying unsuccessfully to attend Trump’s rally, we should also note that even in the overflow area outside the arena, no huge audience was waiting to greet Trump or Pence. By early evening, the arena was nearly empty, plans for Trump and Pence to speak in the overflow area were canceled, and the speaker platform was dismantled.

One other element some are blaming (or crediting, depending on perspective) was a trolling effort by users of social media platform TikTok, and some K-pop fans. They reserved numerous tickets online with no intention of showing up, so that thousands of seats would be left vacant.

Another Trump campaign official refuted that as a factor, however. “We had legitimate 300k signups of Republicans who voted in the last four elections. Those are not [TikTok] kids. It was fear of violent protests. This is obvious with the lack of families and children at the rally. We normally have thousands of families.”

Admission to the rally was on a first-come, first-serve basis, so the TikTok stunt probably was not a major reason for the large number of empty seats. It probably contributed to the initial estimation of the expected crowd size, however.

“Since the day I came down the escalator, I’ve never had an empty seat,” Trump has said, referring to the supposed crowd sizes at his rallies. Though that statement has always been false, never has it been more untrue than on Saturday in Tulsa.

It couldn’t be true that Trump supporters stayed away because they really did fear becoming infected with COVID-19, could it? The largely unmasked people who were in attendance didn’t appear to be worried. Trump has continually downplayed and even ignored the seriousness of the pandemic, contradicting the medical experts and leading his supporters to do the same.

But as the U.S. leads the world in COVID-19 deaths and cases, and as the number of cases is now climbing again in many states, could it be that at least some of his supporters, those who didn’t show up to the rally, have decided that they can no longer trust what Donald Trump says about the coronavirus? Could it be that some of them are even offended that Donald Trump completely disregarded their health and safety by encouraging them to brave the virus in order to attend his rally in Tulsa?

Is it possible they might be growing weary of Trump’s constant opposition to what the medical experts are saying? Might they be tired of Trump’s crowing about how well he’s handled the spread of the virus, despite all evidence to the contrary? Was the idea of being required to sign a waiver saying they would not hold the Trump campaign accountable, should they become infected with COVID-19 the last straw?

Trump continues use racial slurs to refer to the coronavirus (“the kung flu,” “the Chinese virus”), and has used racist and anti-immigrant sentiment to fuel his campaign.

He has downplayed and largely ignored the past and current racial tension that has built to a crescendo in the U.S., too, disparaging the protesters and conflating them with violent, looting opportunists. He was ignorant of the existence of Juneteenth, originally scheduling his rally on that day, in the city where one of America’s most brutal massacres of African Americans took place. Is it possible that Donald Trump has finally overdosed some of his supporters on his unabashed racism?

On June 1, when Trump used military might to clear peaceful demonstrators from a public park so that he could proceed through the park to a widely offensive photo op, numerous decorated and highly respected military leaders criticized his actions. Some leaders from his own party, including President George W. Bush and Senator Mitt Romney, spoke out against the spectacle, warning that Trump was exhibiting signs of an authoritarian ruler. Even some of his appointees distanced themselves from Trump’s actions on that day. Could it be that some of Trump’s supporters are questioning just who it is they voted for in 2016?

Was the turnout at Trump’s rally in Tulsa an indicator of a crack in the seemingly impermeable MAGA wall of support for Trump? Are fewer people willing to walk through fire (or breathe COVID-infected droplets) in their unwavering support of him? No matter what the reasons for the low turnout at Donald Trump’s rally in Tulsa, it wasn’t because people were clamoring to get in and someone kept them out. It was simply because they chose not to come.

Trump reacts after low turnout at Tulsa rally l GMA [2020-06-22]

Trump’s Tulsa rally in less than 4 minutes | Washington Post [2020-06-20]

Editorial: Could Supreme Court LGBT Ruling Impact Christian Right Voting?

Donald Trump, darling of the Christian Right, was elected in large part because he promised them that every day would be Christmas for their political and religious agendas. In return, the Christian Right has been willing to overlook, excuse, and rationalize virtually all of who Donald Trump is, as they have kept their eyes on that prize. But this week, evangelicals had a disappointing and ironic surprise when two of “their” appointed judges sided with the four liberal judges in a 6-3 ruling to protect LGBTQ employees from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender identity

During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump promised to advance the Christian Right platforms opposing abortion, same-sex marriage, and LGBTQ rights and protections. And whether Trump actually said as much, he had them convinced that he would “make America great again” largely by making America an evangelical Christian theocracy. He promised the fulfillment of their wishes in large part by his vow to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death with a conservative justice who would protect their values.

Eighty-one percent of white evangelicals voted for Trump in 2016. In the election exit poll, 21 percent of all voters considered Supreme Court appointments to be the most important factor in how they voted. Of those, 56 percent voted for Trump. They wanted conservative judges whom they could count on to make judgments that protected their values, and they put their trust in Trump and the Republicans to appoint the right judges. Trump kept his promise to appoint a Supreme Court justice who they felt had their backs when he appointed Neil M. Gorsuch to replace Scalia.

On Monday, however, Justice Gorsuch, along with Chief Justice John Roberts, sided with the liberal justices in their ruling that the 1964 Civil Rights Act protects gay, lesbian, and transgender employees from discrimination based on sex. It was Justice Gorsuch, in fact, who wrote the majority opinion.

“Today,” Gorsuch said, “we must decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender. The answer is clear.”

The ruling is a victory for the LGBTQ community. Some (though not the religious right) would see it as a hopeful sign on another front, as well: It was a loss for the Trump administration, who had sided with the employers in three cases involving members of the LGBTQ community who had lost their jobs. Consequently, no longer can Trump and the religious right take for granted that all conservative SCOTUS justices are in their pocket and will automatically take the side of the religious right, just because it is the side of the religious right.

As Washington Post columnist Henry Olsen writes, “Now that Gorsuch has proved himself untrustworthy in their eyes, they would be right to question whether Republican assurances meant anything at all.”

The Christian Right’s previous defenses of Trump, even when they have found him otherwise repugnant, have always been based on the fact that his various legislative actions favored them, and more importantly, he got them their judges. Now, however, they’ve discovered that even some conservative judges may disappoint them by basing decisions on legal merits rather than on making Trump supporters happy. What will this mean in the 2020 election for those conservatives and swing voters who voted for Trump on the basis of SCOTUS picks Christian Right-slanted legislation?

Why Supreme Court’s LGBTQ employment discrimination ruling marks a ‘milestone’ | PBS NewsHour  [2020-06-15]

Why evangelical Christians still support President Trump despite controversies | CBS News  [2018-03-28]