White House Weekend Firing: Andrew McCabe

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was fired on Friday evening, 26 hours before he would have been able to retire and qualify for his full Federal pension, at least some of which may now be at risk. In keeping with what is becoming a classic move by the Trump administration, McCabe heard about his firing from a friend – before he was told by either the White House or by FBI Director Christopher Wray. Though Attorney General Jeff Sessions emailed Andrew McCabe to fire him, McCabe didn’t see Sessions’ firing statement until after it had become television news.

Andrew McCabe supervised the FBI investigation of the Hillary Clinton email scandal, in which Clinton was found to have used a private email server for government correspondence. McCabe also oversaw the investigation of collusion by Russia in Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

Since Andrew McCabe is a career Civil Service employees and not a political appointee, Donald Trump did not have the power to fire McCAbe. Instead, Trump prevailed on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire him.

Sessions stated that Andrew McCabe was fired for alleged misconduct, and that career officials at the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had also recommended terminating McCabe. An internal review by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is understood to say that Andrew McCabe “misled investigators about his role in directing other officials at the FBI to speak to The Wall Street Journal about his involvement in a public corruption investigation into the Clinton Foundation.”

According to Sessions, “The FBI’s OPR then reviewed the report and underlying documents and issued a disciplinary proposal recommending the dismissal of Mr. McCabe. Both the OIG and FBI OPR reports concluded that Mr. McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor − including under oath − on multiple occasions.”

Donald Trump has been waging a Twitter battle against Andrew McCabe for months. Trump seems obsessed with the idea that McCabe’s wife, Jill, who ran for a Virginia State Senate seat (and was defeated), received nearly $700,000 from Hilary Clinton for her campaign, and, that a “pro-Clinton” bias within the FBI was the reason why Clinton was never charged with regard to the email server investigation.

In reality, it was not Hilary Clinton who made the donation to Jill McCabe’s campaign, it was Common Good VA, a PAC controlled by Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, who made the contribution. What’s more, the timeline makes this even less relevant; Jill McCabe ran for the Senate (and was defeated) in 2015. Andrew McCabe did not become Deputy Director of the FBI until 2016.

In light of this, the question that first arose in January, when Andrew McCabe announced his intent to retire, remains: With Andrew McCabe gone, is the way clear to eliminate Robert Mueller?

‘The Five’ on Fallout from the Firing of Andrew McCabe | Fox News [2018-03-19]

How Will Andrew McCabe’s Firing Affect the Mueller Probe? | PBS News Hour [2018-03-19]

 

DACA Deadline Passes; DREAMers Continue in Limbo

Tuesday, March 5, was the date that President Trump set for the DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) program to expire. DACA, however, did not expire. In fact, nothing happened in regards to DACA at all, and it remains on borrowed time.

Many Republicans, as well as Donald Trump himself, place blame on Democrats. “DACA is probably dead because the Democrats don’t really want it, they just want to talk and take desperately needed money away from our Military,” he tweeted in January.

We should not forget, however, that it was President Trump who created the situation that DACA is now in, by overturning DACA and setting the March 5 deadline for DACA to expire. The follow-up by Congress has been inaction, due to a large split on how to proceed. Many Republicans refuse to address the DACA issue separately from the issue of a border wall.

Temporary Reprieve, but Time is Running Out

For the immediate future, most DACA recipients (often referred to as DREAMers), have a temporary reprieve. Following Trump’s shutdown of DACA, Judge William Alsup, a Federal judge in California, ruled that the Trump administration had used a flawed legal argument to do so. Alsup ordered the Department of Homeland Security to restart DACA, and to continue to process DACA renewals for program recipients.

The Trump Administration appealed the ruling, going directly to the Supreme Court instead of following the normal protocol of appealing to the Circuit Court of Appeals in California. The Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal, advising the Department of Justice to follow the regular process of appeals.

DACA Remains in Place, but DREAMers Still at Risk

 The Supreme Court ruling keeps DACA in place for at least six more months. For most of the nearly 700,000 DREAMers, this means that their DACA protections remain for now. Still, with lawmakers taking additional time to agree on a permanent solution, all DREAMers are in a perilous limbo.

At least 10,000 DACA recipients have filed for renewals of their status. As a result of the stop and restart of DACA, however, Washington has a considerable backlog of renewal applications to process. Some DREAMers’ status has expired as they await processing, and this means that, even though they’ve followed the rules, they’re currently without their deportation protections.

The fact that DACA recipients have adhered to protocol may not matter to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent. This week in northern California, agents rounded up 232 people in an ICE raid. And ICE is not just pursuing undocumented immigrants with criminal convictions; it is also going after innocent undocumented immigrants, even if they’re DREAMers.

With other issues now figuring more significantly in the 2018 midterm elections, Congress will likely put off dealing with DACA again. This means that eventually, DREAMers, many of whom have chosen professions such as teaching, or who have volunteered to serve in the American armed forces, will lose their status and ability to work legally in the U.S. – and the freedom and ability granted by DACA to be valuable, legitimate contributors to the society that has formed the only place they know as “home.”

With DACA Protections Still in Place, Recipients in Limbo | PBS News Hour [2018-03-03]

White House on Supreme Court’s Refusal to Hear DACA Appeal  | Fox News [2018-02-26]