White House Staff Who Resisted Trump’s Orders

A number of Trump staff members and subordinates have resisted following Trump’s orders on various occasions, according to Robert Mueller’s report on the Russia investigation into possible ties between Russia and the 2016 presidential election. Though staff have ignored Trump’s orders at various times not related to the Russia investigation, the instances documented in the Mueller report are significant because had staff members not resisted Trump’s orders, they, or Trump, would have been guilty of attempting to impede the investigation.

In his report, Mueller wrote, “The President’s efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests.”

One of the most memorable was former FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump fired in 2017, for various reported reasons, including not complying with Trump’s request to publicly confirm that Trump was not personally under investigation in connection with the Russia probe. Trump’s firing of Comey was the catalyst for Robert Mueller’s investigation.

Here are other examples of White House staff who resisted Trump’s orders:

Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who recused himself from the Russia investigation, resigned under pressure in November of 2017. Sessions, who supported Trump’s harsh policies on many issues, including immigration, nevertheless suffered ongoing derision at the hands of Trump, particularly for recusing himself, and for declining Trump’s request to walk back his recusal.

Former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus resisted Trump’s orders when Trump pressured him to force Jeff Sessions to resign, though Priebus did at first tell Trump he would speak to Sessions. According to Mueller’s report, however, later that day, “Priebus replied that if they fired Sessions, they would never get a new Attorney General confirmed and that the Department of Justice and Congress would turn their backs on the President.” Trump later agreed not to force Sessions to resign at that point.

Former Deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland declined to follow Trump’s request that she write an internal email confirming that Trump “did not direct Flynn to call the Russian Ambassador about sanctions. Priebus said he told the President he would only direct McFarland to write such a letter if she were comfortable with it,” according to Mueller’s report.

The report acknowledges that Trump was not necessarily asking McFarland to lie, but McFarland didn’t know “the full extent of Flynn’s communications with the President and thus could not make the representation the President wanted.” McFarland was sufficiently uncomfortable with Trump’s request and was compelled to document the request.

Some of the other White House staff who refused to comply with Trump’s orders include Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, and White House Counsel Don McGahn.

William Barr, the current Attorney General, has said that no charges were to be brought against Donald Trump for obstruction of justice as a result of Robert Mueller’s report. However, it’s likely that the only reason Trump won’t be charged with obstruction is that these and other staff members resisted Trump’s orders.

Trump tried to stop Mueller investigation, but staff wouldn’t let him, says report | PBS NewsHour [2019-04-18]

Is the Mueller report a roadmap for impeachment? | Fox News [2019-04-22]

Trump Plans to Roll Back Mercury Emissions Regulation

The Trump administration’s latest reversal of Obama-era environmental regulations is a partial rollback of the rule on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. In 2011, under President Obama, the EPA required power plants to reduce the amount of mercury and other pollutants coming out of their smokestacks by 90 percent over five years. By 2016, the industry was fully compliant, and mercury emissions were significantly reduced. The Trump administration, however, says the cost of enforcing the regulation on mercury emissions far outweighs any health benefits.

Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that can cause birth defects, learning disabilities, brain damage, and death. It can accumulate over time, contaminating such things as the fish we eat. Some of the other pollutants emitted with mercury, including soot and nitrogen oxide, can cause heart and lung disease.

The Obama administration calculated that the installation of pollution controls would cost the industry approximately $9.6 billion a year, and would amount to about $6 million a year in health benefits associated with reduced mercury emissions. Factoring in the reduction of the pollutants that accompany mercury emissions, however, they calculated that the public health benefits would be between $37 billion to $90 billion a year.

Trump’s EPA, however, disputes those calculations, calling them “fuzzy math.”

Acting EPA administrator Andrew Wheeler calls the health benefits associated with reducing the other pollutants “co-benefits.” “…They are incidental, and they’re not directly tied to mercury. And so we should exclude those altogether” from the calculations.

This, then, changes the math, and reduces the apparent health benefit of the mercury emission regulation. As a result, Trump’s EPA says utilities will no longer have to comply with it in the future.

The industry itself, however, has expressed the desire to keep the mercury emission policy in place. They have already spent the money on the equipment to reduce emissions, and “would consider it a competitive disadvantage if suddenly things were reversed and they take those scrubbers off,” according to Juliet Eilperin of PBS NewsHour.

It appears that even though the Trump administration continues to chip away at Obama-era environmental regulations, coal-fired power plants will continue to comply with the mercury emissions regulation, even if it is overturned.

How Trump’s EPA is changing the public health benefits around mercury |
PBS NewsHour  [2018-12-28]

Trump Administration Wants To Roll Back Mercury Emissions Limit |
Wochit Politics [2018-12-28]