Editorial: Hydroxychloroquine Is Now a Partisan Topic

The first time the word “hydroxychloroquine” stumbled its way out of Donald Trump’s mouth during a daily White House Coronavirus Task Force briefing, viewers knew it was destined to become a partisan topic. Donald Trump’s continued hyping of hydroxychloroquine as a possible “miracle cure” despite the fact that the FDA has not yet approved it for treatment of COVID-19 has led his supporters, as usual, to disregard science and concrete evidence in favor of whatever Donald Trump says.
Those who challenge Trump’s promotion of the drug, also known as Plaquenil, by pointing out that we don’t have enough evidence yet, that we should tread carefully—that hydroxychloroquine is still in the trial stages for use in combatting COVID-19—are now met with hostility, labeled as partisan, and accused of wanting Trump to fail more than they want to see an effective treatment. Apparently, support or non-support of using the untested drug on coronavirus patients has become a test of one’s fealty to Donald Trump.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s top infectious disease expert, has repeatedly warned that there is no wide or definitive data to support the drug’s efficacy in treating COVID-19, but according to an April 6 report in Politico, “Behind the scenes, career health officials have raised even stronger warnings about the risk to some Americans’ heart health and other complications, but been warned not to publicly speak out and potentially contradict Trump.”
“What do you have to lose?” Trump has said, as he encourages the drug’s use. “It’s been out there for a long time. What do you have to lose? I hope they use it.”
In his characteristic manner of setting up an untruth in such a way that he can easily backpedal it later, if necessary, he has also said, “What do I know? I’m not a doctor, but I have common sense. The FDA feels good about it, as you know, they approved it.”
Donald Trump’s carefully placed “As you know, they approved it” refers to the FDA having approved hydroxychloroqine years ago as a drug for malaria, as well as for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. Trump knows that anyone who chooses to will understand it to mean that the FDA has approved it for use against the coronavirus.
The FDA has now authorized limited emergency use of Plaquenil for trial on certain COVID-19 patients, only. Medical experts warn, however, that the reported benefits of the drug for treating COVID-19 are anecdotal, and that very little scientific evidence exists yet to confirm its effectiveness. Not only should the drug not be pushed to the general public without thorough testing, it could cost the lives of some patients.
Does it make Trump supporters at all uneasy that their president is promoting a drug against the advice of the leading medical experts and scientists? Does it frighten them, even a little, that these leading scientists and medical experts are now being cautioned against disagreeing with the president, who is not a scientist or medical expert?
Apparently, the answer is no. Trump supporters not only ignore the disturbing scene of a president who repeatedly overrides the experts, they borrow from Trump’s false narrative to speak with authority about the drug’s benefits, as well as how “safe” it is to use.
As they have done with the topic of the coronavirus itself, Donald Trump’s supporters take their cues from him regarding what they see as fact and fallacy. The virus quickly became a partisan issue, and even now, it is often possible to guess who supports Donald Trump and who doesn’t by how they’re responding socially and logistically to the virus and the prevention of its spread.
Trump supporters’ unquestioning loyalty to Donald Trump, combined perhaps with an irrational desire for a miracle, has added the hydroxychloroquine topic to the list of other now-partisan topics that, were rational thought involved, should never be partisan issues.
Right-wing pundits such as Fox News’ Laura Ingraham have begun using their pulpits to promote hydroxychloroquine to their audiences, contributing to the partisanship surrounding it. Ingraham even went so far as to mock Dr. William Haseltine, a former professor at Harvard Medical School who has done groundbreaking research on HIV/AIDS, calling him a “quack” when he doubted the drug’s efficacy.
If at some point in the future, hydroxychloroquine does prove to be a “game changer” for treating COVID-19, we all win.
If, however, hydroxychloroquine proves to be ineffective, will world-class medical experts still have to tread lightly around Donald Trump with the evidence? Will scientific proof still be viewed with hostility as nothing more than the desire to “see Trump fail”? If we become sick with COVID-19 and the ER doctor is a Trump supporter, will he or she choose hydroxychloroquine for us over other, possibly better choices?

Trump grilled over continued promotion of hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus | Guardian News [2020-04-06]

Trump Adviser Navarro Clashes With Fauci Over Coronavirus Treatment Endorsed By President Trump | NBC News [2020-04–6]

Editorial: To Manage Anxiety, It’s Best Not to Listen to Donald Trump

In the age of COVID-19, the coronavirus, it’s best not to listen to Donald Trump if one wants to stay safe and keep anxiety at a reasonable level. Several major news networks and radio stations have come to this conclusion, as have many of the American people.
Radio station KUOW, in Washington State, has decided it will no longer air Trump’s daily coronavirus task briefings.
In a tweet on March 24, the station said, “KUOW is monitoring White House briefings for the latest news on the coronavirus — and we will continue to share all news relevant to Washington State with our listeners.”

“However, we will not be airing the briefings live due to a pattern of false or misleading information provided that cannot be fact checked in real time.”

As an example of the president’s litany of falsehoods, for weeks, he has promised that more coronavirus testing supplies would arrive “by the end of the week.” Though more have been delivered to states in recent days, the country still falls terrifyingly short of what is needed in order to have a true picture of how widespread the virus is, and where it is most concentrated.

In spite of the dearth of testing supplies, however, Trump claimed in his Wednesday Coronavirus Task Force briefing that Moon Jae-in, the president of South Korea, had remarked to him, “Your testing procedures are amazing.”

Many Americans have grown weary—and wary—of Donald Trump’s regular offerings of misstatements, exaggerations, and false claims. As the country continues to await a sufficient number of the promised tests; as medical personnel continue to forage for the promised masks and personal protective equipment; as hospitals scramble for more ventilators; as state governors plead with the president for help in the form of funding, human capital, lifesaving equipment, and even consistent and honest messaging; Donald Trump has told them it’s up to them to help themselves.

The federal government, said Trump, “is not a shipping clerk.”

At one daily briefing, Trump told Americans that he had decided to invoke the Defense Production Act, which would give the Trump administration the power to direct U.S. industry to quickly produce emergency medical provisions. As the number of coronavirus cases in America increases exponentially, and as Americans continue to wait in fear and anxiety, Donald Trump continues to refrain from actually triggering the statute that could provide relief.

Trump’s daily briefings are little more than self-aggrandizing soliloquy with sprinklings of mockery for a selected country, leader, or other perceived foe. What Americans have not heard from Donald Trump, however, is a real, genuine, believable message that he cares about them.

When a news correspondent asked him what his message would be for Americans who are scared, Trump barked, “I say that you’re a terrible reporter.… It is a bad signal that you are putting out.”

Trump’s empty promises and lack of action are dangerous, but so are his proclamations. A couple of weeks ago, he began touting an existing drug as a “game-changer” for treating COVID-19; the drug is currently used for malaria and for autoimmune diseases, but is only in the beginning stages of trials for use with the coronavirus. As a result of Trump’s promotion of the drug, there is now a national shortage of it.

Despite medical experts’ warnings, physicians across the country have written prescriptions for themselves, and their families and friends, hoarding the unproven drug and prompting several states to pass laws to regulate how it may be prescribed and limiting quantities. Those who already depend on this drug every day to treat their autoimmune diseases are having difficulty obtaining the amounts they need.

Trump has said numerous times that the drug was “perfectly safe.” However, one elderly couple who believed him took a form of the drug that is not safe for human consumption. The husband died, and the wife is now hospitalized and in critical condition.

In recent days, Trump has taken to telling Americans he wants the country to be “opened up and just raring to go by Easter,” despite the data that shows the pandemic could be in a worse state by then. This idea to put an end to the current “stay home and practice social distancing” precautions and “get people back to work” by Easter has picked up momentum with a few politicians, as medical experts scramble to try to convince Trump that the idea is not only ridiculous, but deadly.

As one employee of NBC News said about Trump’s falsehoods and anxiety-producing statements, “I think the best way to handle the president in the briefing is that you handle the president like you handle the virus. He has to be contained and quarantined and his falsehoods have to be scrubbed so that they don’t rub off on you.”

Trump at odds with medical experts over coronavirus precautions end date | CBS This Morning [2020-03-25]

Heated exchange between Trump and reporters over coronavirus |
Politico [2020-03-20]