Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort Convicted on 8 Counts Each

Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen, two men who have had close and long association with Donald Trump, were both convicted of federal offenses within minutes of each other, in separate parts of the country, on August 21. Manafort, Trump’s former campaign manager, was convicted of financial fraud. Cohen, Trump’s former personal lawyer and “fixer,” pleaded guilty to violating campaign finance laws, as well as other federal financial laws. Cohen and Manafort were each found guilty on eight felony counts, and Manafort be tried again on additional charges.

A jury in Virginia found Paul Manafort guilty on two counts of bank fraud, one count of failure to file a report of accounts in a foreign bank, and five counts of tax evasion. A mistrial was declared on ten additional counts. Prosecutors could decide to try Manafort again on those ten counts. Currently, he faces seven to nine years in prison.

It was known that even before his involvement in the Trump campaign, Manafort had extensive ties to Russia. He participated in the 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with a Russian Lawyer, and was the only non-member of Trump’s family who was present. The meeting, we now know, was arranged with the expectation of obtaining incriminating information on Hillary Clinton.

The New York Times stated on Tuesday, “Mr. Manafort’s conviction was a win for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, if only in denying the president more ammunition for his campaign to discredit Mr. Mueller.”

Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to breaking campaign finance laws, as well as to several counts of bank fraud and tax evasion. In the ever-changing narrative about whether Donald Trump paid “hush money” to an adult film star and a Playboy model with whom he allegedly had affairs to (Did he pay them off? Did he have Cohen pay them off? Did Cohen pay them off without Donald Trump’s knowledge?) Cohen’s guilty plea is significant.

The payments to the two women were made during the 2016 presidential campaign, and, as Cohen’s attorney, Lanny Davis, stated, were made “for the principal purpose of influencing an election.”  Not only did Michael Cohen arrange payments to the two women for their silence, he testified that he did so at the request of “the candidate…to shield him from politically damaging disclosures.”

Cohen has also stated that if questioned by Robert Mueller, he would “tell him the truth about Trump.” Davis has hinted that Cohen would have some “interesting” things to tell Mueller.

One would point out that neither Manafort nor Cohen have inspired faith that they would be credible witnesses in Robert Mueller’s investigation. Trump has already tried to discredit them, as he does with anyone who criticizes or bears witness against him. But Donald Trump himself is not known for his good relationship with truth, or with ethical behavior. (The Washington Post has kept tabs on Trump’s untruths, and they average nine per day.)

The convictions of Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen may be the first significant crack in the armor of Donald Trump’s strange appearance of invincibility. Donald Trump’s administration and inner circle are littered with people who have said and done unethical things. But, as NPR’s Domenico Montenaro writes, the convictions of Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort (were) “the closest Trump has been tied to something potentially criminal as president.”

Opinion | Is this the worst day of Trump’s presidency? | Washington Post [2018-08-21]

What to know about the Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort verdicts | Fox Business [2018-08-21]

Trump Revokes John Brennan’s Security Clearance

Donald Trump revoked the security clearance of John Brennan, former CIA Director under President Obama, on August 15. Brennan’s clearance wasn’t taken away for misconduct, or for any illegal activities; it was revoked because he criticized Trump. The Trump administration had been hinting since late July that it might take away John Brennan’s security clearance, as well as those of others Trump felt had verbally attacked him.

Among John Brennan’s vocal criticisms of Trump were his comments following Trump’s visit with Putin in Finland, when Trump disparaged U.S. intelligence findings in favor of Putin’s claim that there was no Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Brennan termed Trump’s behavior “treasonous,” and called for his impeachment.

Following Trump’s inflammatory remarks and name-calling directed at Omarosa Manigault Newman on the release of her tell-all book, Brennan tweeted, “It’s astounding how often you fail to live up to minimum standards of decency, civility, & probity. Seems like you will never understand what it means to be president, nor what it takes to be a good, decent, & honest person. So disheartening, so dangerous for our Nation.” Brennan’s security clearance was revoked the following day.

Though Trump, as President, has the legal authority to revoke an official’s security clearance, past presidents, as a rule, have never done so for political motives or without reasonable cause — and certainly not to be vindictive. “Cause” would include security concerns, such as mishandling of classified documents, alcoholism, or financial issues.

Michael V. Hayden, CIA Director under George W. Bush, and also an official whose security clearance the Trump Administration has threatened to revoke, has suggested that Trump is using clearance revocations to “pressure his critics into silence.”

John Brennan tweeted, “This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics…It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about the cost of speaking out.”

Since Brennan lost his security clearance, numerous other former National Security officials have quickly responded in support of him. Currently, three joint letters signed by former officials, both Democrat and Republican, have been written on Brennan’s behalf. The most recent one, written on Monday, August 20, contained 177 signatures backing John Brennan.

“The country will be weakened if there is a political litmus test applied before seasoned experts are allowed to share their views,” said Monday’s letter.

John Brennan is considering taking Donald Trump to court over the security clearance issue. “If my (security) clearances and my reputation – as I’m being pulled through the mud right now – if that’s the price I have to pay to prevent Donald Trump from doing this to other people, to me, that’s a small price to pay,” said Brennan.

Brennan may take Trump to court over security clearances | Fox Business [2018-08-20]

Line crossed in Trump revoking Brennan security clearance? | CBS This Morning [2018-08-18]