*Congress – Page 4 – * Failed Pols

President Trump recently lost two lawsuits challenging subpoenas for financial records from several financial institutions. On Monday, May 20, Washington, D.C. federal judge Amit Mehta ruled in favor of the U.S. House of Representatives, who requested Trump’s financial records from his accounting firm, Mazars LLP. Later in the week, New York Judge Edgardo Ramos rejected Trump’s request to block subpoenas from Deutsche Bank and Capital One, requiring them to comply with Congress’ requests. Some other institutions have already complied with the subpoenas.

The lawsuits put forth this past week by Trump appear to be aimed at stalling or stopping Congress’ various investigations into Trump’s affairs. The issues being investigated include Trump’s tax returns; various financial dealings, including his Washington hotel; security clearances for members of his family; and policy decisions Trump has made. Trump has refused to cooperate with any of the investigations, calling them “political” and lacking legislative purpose.

Trump’s attorneys hold that Congress simply wants to “turn up something that Democrats can use as a political tool against the president now and in the 2020 election.”

But many see the swiftness of both judges’ rulings to uphold the subpoenas as an indicator of the weakness of Trump’s legal cases. This strengthens speculation that Trump will ultimately lose.

House Oversight Committee Chair Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), called Mehta’s decision a “slam dunk.”

Previously, many progressive members of Congress had been looking to initiate impeachment proceedings in order to pursue criminal investigations. But these victories provide support for Congress’ investigations into possible criminal activity by Trump, reducing or eliminating the need for impeachment proceedings, as they make legal progress.

Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), House Judiciary Committee Chair, who had been urging House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to open impeachment proceedings, agrees that Congress’ victories this past week have made the argument for impeachment “much weaker.”

Wells Fargo and TD Bank have already turned over documents to the House Financial Services Committee, with “a few thousand” coming from Wells Fargo and “a handful” coming from TD Bank. Congress has subpoenaed a total of nine financial institutions for financial records pertaining to Donald Trump.

Federal judge sides with Congress, ordering Trump to turn over financial records | CBS This Morning [2019-05-21]

Report: Wells Fargo, TD Bank have turned Trump’s financial records over to the House | Fox News [2019-05-22]

Tuesday, March 5, was the date that President Trump set for the DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) program to expire. DACA, however, did not expire. In fact, nothing happened in regards to DACA at all, and it remains on borrowed time.

Many Republicans, as well as Donald Trump himself, place blame on Democrats. “DACA is probably dead because the Democrats don’t really want it, they just want to talk and take desperately needed money away from our Military,” he tweeted in January.

We should not forget, however, that it was President Trump who created the situation that DACA is now in, by overturning DACA and setting the March 5 deadline for DACA to expire. The follow-up by Congress has been inaction, due to a large split on how to proceed. Many Republicans refuse to address the DACA issue separately from the issue of a border wall.

Temporary Reprieve, but Time is Running Out

For the immediate future, most DACA recipients (often referred to as DREAMers), have a temporary reprieve. Following Trump’s shutdown of DACA, Judge William Alsup, a Federal judge in California, ruled that the Trump administration had used a flawed legal argument to do so. Alsup ordered the Department of Homeland Security to restart DACA, and to continue to process DACA renewals for program recipients.

The Trump Administration appealed the ruling, going directly to the Supreme Court instead of following the normal protocol of appealing to the Circuit Court of Appeals in California. The Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal, advising the Department of Justice to follow the regular process of appeals.

DACA Remains in Place, but DREAMers Still at Risk

The Supreme Court ruling keeps DACA in place for at least six more months. For most of the nearly 700,000 DREAMers, this means that their DACA protections remain for now. Still, with lawmakers taking additional time to agree on a permanent solution, all DREAMers are in a perilous limbo.

At least 10,000 DACA recipients have filed for renewals of their status. As a result of the stop and restart of DACA, however, Washington has a considerable backlog of renewal applications to process. Some DREAMers’ status has expired as they await processing, and this means that, even though they’ve followed the rules, they’re currently without their deportation protections.

The fact that DACA recipients have adhered to protocol may not matter to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent. This week in northern California, agents rounded up 232 people in an ICE raid. And ICE is not just pursuing undocumented immigrants with criminal convictions; it is also going after innocent undocumented immigrants, even if they’re DREAMers.

With other issues now figuring more significantly in the 2018 midterm elections, Congress will likely put off dealing with DACA again. This means that eventually, DREAMers, many of whom have chosen professions such as teaching, or who have volunteered to serve in the American armed forces, will lose their status and ability to work legally in the U.S. – and the freedom and ability granted by DACA to be valuable, legitimate contributors to the society that has formed the only place they know as “home.”

With DACA Protections Still in Place, Recipients in Limbo | PBS News Hour [2018-03-03]

White House on Supreme Court’s Refusal to Hear DACA Appeal | Fox News [2018-02-26]

Category: *Congress

Subpoenas for Trump Financial Records Upheld

DACA Deadline Passes; DREAMers Continue in Limbo