Hope Hicks Tenders Resignation as Fourth White House Communications Director

White House Communications Director Hope Hicks announced this week that she is resigning. The White House asserts that Hicks had been considering leaving the White House for several weeks, and that her decision had nothing to do with the current controversies surrounding the White House. Nevertheless, though we’re less surprised each time we hear of a new White House firing or resignation, Hope Hicks’ departure raises eyebrows for a few reasons.

Hicks’ Departure Fuels Speculation on Possible Motivation:

Hicks announced her plans to resign the day after testifying before the House Intelligence Committee during a nine-hour session. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team questioned Hicks as part of the investigation into Russia interference in the 2016 election.

During the session, Hicks told the House Intelligence Committee that she occasionally told “white lies” for Trump. She assured the Committee, however, that she had not lied about anything connected with the Russia investigation. For much of the questioning, Hicks elected to use the shield of executive privilege to refrain from answering. Is she worried about placing herself in legal jeopardy?

Hope Hicks, as one of the President’s most trusted aides, has access to a lot of sensitive information. Does she know more than we think about James Comey’s firing? What could she tell us about events during certain meetings?

As White House Communications Director, Hope Hicks was instrumental in drafting a White House statement, during a meeting aboard Air Force One, in response to the speculation about Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with Russian lawyers who promised damaging information on Hilary Clinton.

An additional awkward situation in which Hope Hicks has found herself in the middle is that of former White House Staff Secretary Rob Porter, who resigned under pressure following spousal abuse and domestic violence allegations. While Hicks was in a romantic relationship with Porter, her job required that she draft the official communication of the White House response to the issue.

The Element of Surprise

Hope Hicks has been President Trump’s longest-serving aide. She began as Donald Trump’s press secretary in January of 2015, when Trump decided to run for President. Hicks had previously worked for Ivanka Trump’s fashion line, starting in August of 2014. She has had close access to the President – almost as close as that of an immediate family member.

As one of the most influential people to Donald Trump, Hope Hicks had Trump’s ear, as well as the ability to “manage” Trump. She not only tried to protect his image for the news, she tried to protect Trump from the news, or at least “deliver to the President the type of world that he believes is unfolding. She would interpret articles for him, and essentially present to him a curated version of what’s happening,” according to Michael Wolff’s book, Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House.

As Trump’s right-hand person, Hope Hicks has worked around the clock, 365 days a year, for Trump. She’s been referred to as Trump’s “one-woman PR firm.” It’s possible that Hope Hicks is simply burned out.

White House Churn

Hope Hicks, the youngest-ever White House Communications Director, came to the post with no prior experience for the role. As with others who have been appointed to posts in the Trump administration, many speculate that Hicks would likely not have had the opportunity, but for Trump. Nevertheless, she did her job well, and was widely liked and respected.

According to Ed O’Keefe, of the Washington Post, “Part of the reason she got the job in the first place is because several seasoned Republican or other communication professionals here in Washington, or in other parts of the country were approached, and simply took a pass on it….And it will be curious to see whether they find someone who comes out of professional Republican politics or Washington political handling, so to speak, who may want or be able to step into this role, or who frankly could step into this role, and have the President’s trust and his ear the way that she has over the last several (years.)”

Immediately following the downgrade of nearly three dozen White House Employees’ security clearances (including that of Jared Kushner), some say that Hicks’ resignation is further demonstration that the Trump transition was poorly managed, and too quickly executed. Poor planning has resulted in the ongoing problems that continually plague the Trump Administration.

Hope Hicks will be eighteenth on the list of White House staff who have either resigned or been fired. The White House now must look for its fifth Communications Director since the start of the Trump Presidency. As one would expect, morale is at an all-time low at the White House.

Hope Hicks to Resign: President Trump Losing Trusted Adviser | Fox News
[2018-02-28]

Analysis: Hope Hicks Resigns Amid Controversy |  Associated Press
[2018-02-28]

 

 

 

Gun Control Debate: Stalling Prevention of the Next Mass Shooting?

After the eighteenth school shooting in the U.S. since 2018 began (and one of the deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history), it seems preposterous that there is even any question that we need to take a look at tighter gun control regulations. The debate polarizes, then stalls, though, at the black-and-white interpretation of “gun control” as “taking away all of our guns.”

The Trump Presidency marks a new era for gun rights supporters. Protecting second-amendment rights, as interpreted by current gun enthusiasts, seems to take precedence over establishing protections for would-be victims, in the form of tighter gun control laws. Yet, in the past five months of Trump’s presidency, three of the deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history have occurred.

After each of the past three mass shootings, Paul Ryan has responded with some variation of “This is not the time to jump to some conclusion, not knowing the full facts.”

Paul Ryan: No ‘Knee Jerk’ Reactions On Guns. Ever. | All In | MSNBC [2018-02-15]

In its seeming avoidance of addressing gun control, Congress wants to cite anything and everything but lack of gun control as the cause of these deadly shootings. “It’s a mental health issue” tends to come to the top of the list.

Earlier, however, on what was perhaps Opposite Day at the White House, Congress demonstrated that it didn’t view mental illness as a culprit in gun violence. In the first month of Trump’s presidency, Congress repealed Obama-era gun control legislation passed after the Sandy Hook massacre, during which 20 first-graders were among those murdered by a mentally disturbed man.  The legislation would have made it harder for people with certain mental illnesses to purchase firearms.

“Now, the only thing Congress has done (about) guns since Sandy Hook, is make it easier for mentally ill people to get guns,” said Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut.

Congress Allows Mentally Ill To Buy Guns, Rolls Back Obama-Era Regulations | TODAY [2018-02-16]

We should note that those who see gun ownership as a fundamental right often are referring to ownership of more than just a revolver, a shotgun , or a bolt-action rifle. They defend the right to own semi-automatic weapons, such as the AR-15, the weapon used most often in mass shootings. Often citing “home protection,” they appear to want guns that do so much more than protect from intruders or assailants; they want guns with the ability to blow human bone to bits, obliterate multiple intruders at once, and perhaps even provide protection in case of a zombie apocalypse.

So, despite arguing for the right to own weapons such as the AR-15, which was designed solely for the purpose of killing human beings, staunch gun enthusiasts are also quick to point out that it’s not the guns that are killing people. In addition to mental health issues, they often cite poor parenting, the need for gun education, the lack of safety measures (such as metal detectors and armed guards) in schools, and the abundance of violent TV shows and video games – but not the availability of guns – as the culprits for gun violence.

Clearly, many possible factors contribute to the rate of gun violence and mass shootings in the United States. Tighter gun control is but one factor, albeit an important one. But as we debate how to best address these other factors, somewhere, someone in the U.S. is perhaps taking out his semi-automatic firearms and contemplating the next mass shooting. And we’re stalling the prevention of that mass shooting as we avoid addressing the gun control issue head-on.

President Donald Trump Talks Mental Health But Not Guns In Wake Of Florida Shooting | TODAY [2018-02-18]