Editorial: Voter Intimidation and Suppression are Illegal, and Our President Openly Encourages Both

Voter intimidation and suppression are illegal, as is election tampering. Yet our current president continues to openly support and encourage all three, evidently in fear that those are the only ways to ensure that he wins re-election. In few areas are Trump’s authoritarian ambitions more apparent than in his efforts at voter suppression and intimidation, as well as election tampering; and even if some guns, harassment, or violence happen to be in the mix, so be it.

Donald Trump has insisted that the only way he will lose the 2020 presidential election is if the Democrats cheat. Having already nursed his supporters’ distrust of anyone but himself and those associated with him, Trump has also persuaded his base to believe his narrative about election results. Trump’s desperate crafting of such an outcome expectation has set the stage for his supporters to refuse to accept any election outcome other than Trump’s re-election. This, in itself, is election tampering by Donald Trump. Cheating, even.

When it became clear that the coronavirus pandemic would stretch beyond the summer and into the time of the presidential election, it also became apparent that polling venues would be risky places to be on Election Day. Consequently, many states decided to make it easier for their residents to vote by mail in order to protect them from contracting the virus while voting, as well as make voting generally more accessible for every voter.

Donald Trump has used the situation as another opportunity to meddle with the election by insisting that voting by mail leads to widespread voter fraud. Though it’s true that more Democrats than Republicans vote by mail, both Republican-led and Democrat-led states have successfully carried out past elections that were largely by mail-in ballot, with negligible voter fraud. Trump, however, continues to try to promote mistrust in voting by mail, and his administration has initiated several lawsuits to try to stop voting by mail. If more voters vote (and more mail-in voting ensures that more voters will vote), it is a threat to a Trump victory.

Over the summer, as if to reinforce his scheme to prevent successful mail-in voting, Trump appointed top campaign donor Louis DeJoy as Postmaster General of the U.S. Postal Service. DeJoy soon issued “cost-savings measures” that included reductions in service; decommissioning of hundreds of mail sorting machines; removal of numerous blue mailboxes across the country; and abolishing the overtime needed to ensure that all of the day’s mail is processed and delivered in a timely manner. DeJoy’s actions brought into question whether he would, intentionally or unintentionally, prevent mail-in ballots from arriving in time to be counted in the election.

Following challenges by Congress and by consumers, DeJoy pulled back on his plan to continue decommissioning postal machines and removing mailboxes. By that time, however, many machines had already been taken out of service, and many mailboxes had already been removed. Further, many Americans’ faith in the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail-in ballots on time had been eroded.

For those who will not be casting their votes by mail, the polling places have begun to open for early voting. As evidenced by the hours-long lines of voters waiting to cast their votes, Donald Trump’s efforts have not squelched voter enthusiasm, nor have they prevented votes from being cast in any fashion.

As Donald Trump has seen that nothing will deter voters from voting in the 2020 election, he has now called for an army of his supporters to deem themselves “poll watchers,” and go to voting places to “watch very carefully” as voters exercise their right to vote.

“I’m urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully because that’s what has to happen,” Said Trump at his first presidential debate against former Vice President Joe Biden. “I am urging them to do it.”

Sean Morales-Doyle, deputy director of the Brennan Center’s voting rights and elections program, has said that many states have laws that dictate who is allowed to be in a polling place at a given time, including who is permitted to be a poll watcher, and what a poll watcher is allowed to do.

“There are laws like this in many states,” says Morales-Doyle. “Regular citizens can’t just take it upon themselves to engage in this kind of poll watching, and for good reason, because it opens up the possibility of voter intimidation, of vigilantism, which the president is seemingly encouraging. But it is illegal.”

Many Democratic leaders and election officials, including Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford, also fear voter intimidation, and particularly, suppression of Black voters and other voters of color. Ford tweeted that Trump wasn’t referring to standard poll watching, but instead was calling for “voter intimidation.”

“Voter intimidation is illegal in Nevada. Believe me when I say it: You do it, and you will be prosecuted,” said Ford.

“The President is openly urging his supporters to congregate at polling places, go inside, and ostensibly harass and intimidate voters,” said Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring. “While there are authorized ‘poll watchers’ who monitor polls on Election Day, their duties are clearly laid out, and they do not include what President Trump has suggested.”

During early voting at one location in Fairfax, Virginia, a group of about 50 Trump supporters gathered, waving Trump 2020 banners, wrapping themselves in American flags, and shouting, “Four more years! Four more years!” Though the group hadn’t violated any election laws, some voters felt threatened, and requested escorts into the building.

In Michigan, fearing that unauthorized “poll watching” by Trump’s supporters could turn violent, the state has banned open carry of guns at polling places on Election Day, as well as at places where absentee ballots are counted.

Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said that the Michigan directive prohibits the open carry of firearms “in a polling place, in any hallway used by voters to enter or exit, or within 100 feet of any entrance to a building in which a polling place is located.”

Donald Trump would like to abolish “liberty and justice for all” by using his supporters, the very people who claim to wield their guns in support of “liberty and justice” (at least for some), to help him accomplish his goal. He has shown that he would do anything to prevent an election result that is not in his favor, including stopping the mail, and even postponing the election (which can’t be done without an act of Congress).

Trump may fantasize about winning re-election, no matter what, and he may fantasize even more about being an authoritarian leader, but Americans in large numbers have shown how dogged they are when it comes to the standing up against the attempts by the president and his enablers to prevent them from casting their votes in this election.

After all votes are counted, may the total be against the one who wanted to suppress and intimidate voters, and may it be in favor of the candidate who will work for “liberty and justice,” not just for some, but for all.

Trump’s “poll watcher” comments raise concerns about voter intimidation |
CBS News [2020-10-06]

Trump Supporters Disrupt Early Voting in Virginia | Now This News
[2020-09-22]

Editorial: Republican Lawmakers Hope that Distancing Themselves from Trump Will Save Their Seats

Republican lawmakers are increasingly fearful that Donald Trump won’t be getting another term in the White House, and with that real possibility, as well as the threat of losing the GOP majority in the Senate, many are distancing themselves from Trump as a self-preservation move.

Under Trump, GOP lawmakers have allowed their political careers to be determined by the president. Their alignment with Donald Trump, and their unwavering support of even the most questionable Trumpian moves has all but guaranteed the votes of their Trump-supporting constituents. To criticize Trump, or to disagree with him, could ignite his vengeance in the form of bullying, mocking, incendiary tweets, and ultimately, lost votes. During Trump’s presidency, they have, as a body, placed their loyalty to Donald Trump above their loyalty to country, and often above the good of their constituents.

From his handling of the coronavirus pandemic (including his own COVID-19 diagnosis), to his refusal to condemn white supremacist groups, to his increasingly erratic behavior, Trump’s actions and words have alienated many Republican and swing voters during this election season. Some Republican lawmakers who are up for re-election fear that alignment with the president could prove to be a liability for them, and consequently, many are changing their tactics.

“I think Trump might cause us a tidal wave. He is ankle weights in a pool on Senate candidates,” said a top Republican strategist and Trump supporter who asked not to be named, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Though these Republican lawmakers are distancing themselves from Trump, most aren’t willing to openly criticize him, for fear of losing the votes of those who are still staunch Trump supporters. It’s a tough spot, because they also need the votes of anti-Trump Republicans who would either stay home or get behind Biden.

One new GOP approach is to shift the emphasis away from the issue of loyalty to Trump, and instead try to persuade voters to imagine a threatening, doomsday scenario if Democrats win the Senate.

The Senate Conservative Fund has put out a fundraising message saying, “If we lose the Senate, there will be no firewall to stop the Democrats from implementing their ‘Armageddon’ plan to pack the courts with activist judges and to add four new Democrats to the Senate by giving statehood to DC and Puerto Rico.”

They talk of a hypothetical “Joe Biden’s America,” where the scourge of liberalism would infiltrate the land. They even threaten that a Biden presidency would usher in Socialism (or Communism).

“Let me tell you the nightmare scenario for our state,” said Republican Senator Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, in a debate with his Democratic opponent, Jaime Harrison. “If they keep the House, take over the Senate and Biden’s president, God help us all. … The most liberal agenda in the history of American politics is coming out of the House to the Senate.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) appears to be nervous about losing to his popular Democratic opponent, Amy McGrath. McConnell has taken to trying to position himself as the key senator who could, as he did when Obama was president, prevent Democrats from furthering their “radical” agenda in Congress.

“The way to make sure that doesn’t happen is to keep me as the majority leader, the firewall against disaster,” said McConnell.

Arizona Senator Martha McSally has also tried to shift voters’ attention from her alliance with Trump. When the moderator asked McSally during a debate with Democratic opponent Mark Kelly if she was proud to serve under Donald Trump during her Air Force career, McSally wouldn’t directly answer, and instead replied, “I’m proud that I’m fighting for Arizonans on things like cutting your taxes.”

When the moderator asked the question again, McSally continued to avoid answering the question.

Many Republican lawmakers, recognizing that Americans are disgusted and fearful about the way Trump has handled the coronavirus, have begun to criticize Trump’s mismanagement themselves.

Texas GOP Senator John Cornyn has berated Trump for his downplaying of the virus and its threat, saying Trump had “let his guard down.” Cornyn also commented that Trump’s COVID-19 diagnosis should remind Americans to “exercise self-discipline.”

Cornyn’s words were a subtle criticism, but they go against Trump’s casual dismissal of the virus, and his refusal to wear a mask or practice social distancing, even after being diagnosed with COVID-19 himself.

On the day Trump left the hospital, still contagious, Trump tweeted, “Don’t be afraid of Covid. Don’t let it rule your life.” At that point, more than 210,000 Americans had died from the virus.

Reacting to Trump’s tweet, as well as to his reckless behavior while still infectious, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who could lose her seat to Democrat Sarah Gideon, commented, “I couldn’t help but think that sent the wrong signal… I did not think that it set a good example at all.”

One of the most telling indicators of where Trump stands with voters, and the GOP’s awareness that Trump could be a liability, is a new Susan Collins campaign ad that urges Maine voters to vote for Collins “no matter who you’re voting for for president.”

Not all Republican lawmakers are so subtle, however. On Thursday, Nebraska GOP Senator Ben Sasse delivered a harsh and open criticism of Trump. Though Sasse has mostly supported Trump and his policies, he is one of the few sitting Republican senators who has criticized him from time to time.

During a campaign town hall phone call with constituents, a woman asked Sasse why he is so hard on the president.

“The way he kisses dictators’ butts. I mean, the way he ignores the Uighurs, our literal concentration camps in Xinjiang. Right now, he hasn’t lifted a finger on behalf of the Hong-Kongers,” responded Sasse.

“The United States now regularly sells out our allies under his leadership, the way he treats women, spends like a drunken sailor. The ways I criticize President Obama for that kind of spending; I’ve criticized President Trump for as well,” Sasse continued. “He mocks evangelicals behind closed doors. His family has treated the presidency like a business opportunity. He’s flirted with white supremacists.”

Sasse added that he fears Trump’s “stupid political obsessions” and “rage tweeting” will drive voters away.

Though there have been indications that other Republican lawmakers feel similarly, it’s surprising (and, admittedly, refreshing) to finally hear a sitting GOP senator say it all out loud.

What is most striking (and what should be appalling to Republican constituents) as Republicans scramble to shift their positions in an attempt to win re-election is that it demonstrates that their careers are based less on serving the needs of their constituents, and more on simply keeping their seats in the game. Americans have always said that of politicians on both sides, but never, one could argue, has an entire body of American lawmakers been quite so willing to sacrifice their souls, and America’s well-being. Republican lawmakers, as Trump’s enablers, appear to have dug a hole for themselves that may be too deep to climb out of in time for re-election, even if they do distance themselves from Donald Trump.

US election: Senior republicans distance themselves from Trump |
Al Jazeerah English [2020-09-25]

Arizona Senator Martha McSally dodges Trump question during debate | CBS News  [2020-10-08]