Editorial: Federal Agents at Polling Places – Trump’s Latest Authoritarian Aspiration

In Donald Trump’s latest attempt at achieving his authoritarian aspirations, he told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he was planning to send federal law enforcement to polling locations in November in order to prevent voter fraud. As he demonstrated in June when he used U.S. military force to break up peaceful protesters, Trump thinks intimidation and demonstrations of force are good ways to impress voters. Unfortunately for Trump, however, voter intimidation is against federal law, and voting rights advocates and others see this latest proposed exercise as an attempt to intimidate voters.

Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said that DHS has no authority to send federal agents to oversee polling locations.

“That’s not what we do at the Department of Homeland Security,” said Wolf. “We have law enforcement authorities and law enforcement officers at the department. We have express authorities given to us by Congress and this is not one of them.”

Further, some states prohibit law enforcement, whether local or federal, from being present at polling locations on Election Day unless they are there to vote or serve a warrant.

Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, told ABC News the president can’t give orders to local sheriffs, and he can’t send federal forces into polling places.

“There’s no law that I’m aware of that permits, or that would authorize, the president to deploy federal law enforcement or military or anything like that for domestic use in and around in or around polling places,”

“Just checking someone’s ID at the door doesn’t really do anything from an election security perspective — from a voter intimidation perspective, I can see how having law enforcement ask people for IDs when you’re entering into a polling location could be intimidating.”

Intimidation is a component of Donald Trump’s leader fantasy. One has to wonder if Trump dreams of standing on a balcony wearing a generic military uniform as a tank parade in his honor passes by below, the crowds saluting and cheering for him in their mass hysteria, though they can’t say exactly why.

“Are you going to have poll watchers?” Hannity asked Trump in response to his proclamation. “Are you going to have an ability to monitor, to avoid fraud and crosscheck whether or not these are registered voters?”

“We’re going to have everything,” Trump responded. “We’re going to have sheriffs, and we’re going to have law enforcement, and we’re going to have, hopefully, U.S. attorneys, and we’re going to have everybody, and attorney generals. But it’s very hard.”

Hard indeed, when it’s all illegal. Although, when has Donald Trump not ignored the law or the Constitution when it disagreed with his worldview?

Even if Donald Trump doesn’t get to deploy special agents to polling places, he knows that if he threatens to do so, and talks about it enough, that’s almost as effective for intimidating voters. Discouraging people from voting is what this is all about.

“The outrage isn’t that he can’t accomplish it, the outrage is that the president is actually trying to scare voters into thinking that there’s going to be an illegal presence of law enforcement at the polls, illegally checking IDs,” said Wendy Weiser, who is Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. “(Trump) has no authority over a state election administration official, and that many jurisdictions don’t even allow law enforcement in polling places.”

“The president needs to stop spreading misinformation,” said Nellie Gorbea, Rhode Island secretary of state.”These are just tactics to suppress the vote.”

Donald Trump’s attempts to suppress the 2020 presidential vote became clear with his efforts to discourage people from voting by mail. During the coronavirus pandemic, an increasing number of states are making it easier for voters to cast mail-in ballots in order to stay safe. Trump, however, has promoted the false idea that mail-in voting leads to vast voter fraud (studies have shown that it doesn’t). Both Democrat- and Republican-led states have successfully held elections with widespread mail-in voting—some with nearly universal mail-in voting— for years. As if to ensure that mail-in voting would go awry this election year, Trump has appointed top campaign donor and Trump loyalist Louis DeJoy as the Postmaster General, just in time to make operational changes that are slowing down mail before the election. DeJoy has recently denied plans or efforts to obstruct mail-in ballots, though Democrats are not convinced. Trump has also suggested that the election should be postponed (it can’t without an act of Congress and a very good reason.

Though 83 percent of voters will have the chance to vote by mail this year, many of them are now fearful that their votes won’t be safe, if mailed. Hence, Trump’s additional efforts to deter in-person voting, as well.

Trump’s desire to discourage voter participation with such stunts as placing federal agents at polling places shows how fearful he is of losing re-election. What will be his next stunt, if allowed? Detaining the drivers of cars with Biden/Harris bumper stickers? Illegal searches of homes with Biden/Harris yard signs? There are still 70 days till the 2020 election; we can’t assume Trump’s voter suppression efforts are even close to being over.

Trump to send law enforcement to polls | Sky News Australia [2020-08-21]

Trump Wants to Have Sheriffs, Police, Attorneys General at Polls for Election | Veuer [2020-08-21]

Editorial: Republicans Can’t Agree on How Best to Malign Kamala Harris

The Republicans are having a difficult time with 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s pick of Kamala Harris as his running mate. She’s formidable, and she’s a woman (two characteristics that, together, offend the sensibilities of a few in the GOP), but the issue is that they can’t agree on how best to attack Kamala Harris.

To the party of Trump (and we should note here that there are Republicans who would like to distance themselves from the party of Trump), Harris is all at once a socialist and a sellout to Wall Street. She is a moderate (which, to many Republicans, means she is without principles), at the same time that she is a radical extreme leftist. She is too tough on crime, but she’s too weak on crime. Donald Trump has been less analytical, placing Harris into the category of other intelligent and assertive women like Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton, whom he calls “nasty.”

When Joe Biden first announced Kamala Harris as his running mate, some Trumpers gleefully pointed out the disapproval from the far left because she isn’t progressive enough.

“Bernie Bros get burnt!” Tweeted Brad Parscale, a Trump campaign aide.

Immediately following the announcement of Harris as Joe Biden’s pick, some right-wing pundits were warning about a hostile extreme liberal takeover of the Democratic Party.

“Kamala Harris’ extreme positions … show that the left-wing mob is controlling Biden’s candidacy, just like they would control him as president,” said Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.

That the Republican Party would float the idea of “left-wing mob control” of Biden and Harris is in keeping with the party’s increasing slant to the far right, which fits well with its bent for supporting conspiracy theories.

For other Trumpers, the fact that financial advisory firms such as Signum Global have started telling clients that Biden’s choice of Harris reinforces the notion that the Democratic ticket is more moderate than progressive is a sign that progressives will be disenchanted with the Democratic ticket.

But wait— Other Trumpers are saying that Harris wants to turn the Democratic Party toward socialism (a concept they appear not to understand).

On the Wednesday following the announcement of Kamala Harris on Biden’s ticket, Vice President Mike Pence, in a fundraising email, wrote, “From the very first day of this Administration, President Trump has set our Nation on a path to freedom and opportunity. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris would set America on the path of SOCIALISM and DECLINE.”

Speaking of takeovers, the Republican Party seems to have been taken over by people who don’t know much about history or political science.

Quick to depict Kamala Harris as a radical lefty, they have posited that in Kamala Harris, the far left has infiltrated the Democratic Party. Not only that, but Joe Biden, they hint, is little more than a puppet controlled by the radical left.

David Bossie, Trump’s 2016 deputy campaign manager, thinks both Biden and Harris are malleable. In a recent op-ed piece, Bossie wrote, “Make no mistake about it, if elected, this weak Democratic duo will aid and abet the radical socialists and anarchists at every turn…Americans must reject Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and their dangerous ideology.”

CNN contributor Scott Jennings, a former special assistant to President George W. Bush and a former campaign adviser to Sen. Mitch McConnell, writes, “Her politics— liberal with more than a hint of authoritarianism (think of her attempts to get Donald Trump banned fro Twitter) sprinkled in for good measure— fit well on a national ticket trending hard towards both.” Jennings ignores the fact that his party supports a president who regularly defies the checks and balances of the federal government, wants to hobble the U.S. Postal Service in order to interfere with the presidential election, and fires government officials just for disagreeing with him.

Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson, on the other hand, knows that hate and love are just two sides of the same emotion, so instead, he chose an attempt at indifference by simply trying to diminish Harris. In a monologue on his Fox News show last week, he not only dismissed the correct pronunciation of Kamala Harris’ name, he said this: “So, it seemed inconceivable that given his current state, Joe Biden would choose someone so transparently one-dimensional as Kamala Harris, someone as empty as he is. It would be the first entirely hollow presidential ticket in American history and we thought it could never happen. But it is. They’re doing it anyway.”

Still other members of the Party of Trump have taken to insulting Harris by making a show of being insulted by her. On Fox News host Jeanine Pirro’s show, Lara Trump, Donald Trump’s daughter-in-law, who is married to Eric Trump, and who spearheaded the Women for Trump tour, said, “I for one was insulted when months ago Joe Biden came out and he said, ‘Guess what? It’s going to be a woman who’s my running mate.’ Let’s not worry about qualifications, let’s not worry about what they bring to the table. If these people want to stand up for equality, people in this country will never be fully equal in their eyes until they stop pandering for votes and playing identity politics.

“It didn’t even matter who it was going to be,” Lara Trump concluded. “Women were already insulted.”

As if to demonstrate that she wasn’t too passionate about Kamala Harris, she did what appears to have become a standard move by the right to show disregard for Harris: she mispronounced Kamala Harris’ name.

Kamala Harris is neither a radical left-wing extremist, nor a socialist, nor a noncommittal people-pleaser. Nor is she a token. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden’s “dangerous ideology” talks of a future, and their ideal for the American experience in that future, where groups of people are not marginalized; where Americans can earn a living wage, and where they can have access to affordable health care. The party of Trump, on the other hand, hopes for a future that is dangerous to everyone but straight white folks; one that looks like its version of an idealized past, where white heterosexual people are in power and everyone else “keeps their place;” and where no one gets help or health care or food that they may not “deserve.”

Americans are free to disagree with Kamala Harris’ platform, but she is clear on what she stands for. The party of Trump has a platform that is not based on what it stands for, but what it is against.

Republicans Struggle To React To Kamala Harris As VP Pick | TODAY
[2020-08-13]

Republicans Can’t Agree On How To Attack Kamala As Biden/Harris Make 1st Appearance | Roland S. Martin. [2020-08-13]